These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23845458)

  • 1. Comparative revision rates of inflatable penile prostheses using woven Dacron® fabric cylinders.
    Enemchukwu EA; Kaufman MR; Whittam BM; Milam DF
    J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2189-93. PubMed ID: 23845458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term mechanical reliability of AMS 700 series inflatable penile prostheses: comparison of CX/CXM and Ultrex cylinders.
    Daitch JA; Angermeier KW; Lakin MM; Ingleright BJ; Montague DK
    J Urol; 1997 Oct; 158(4):1400-2. PubMed ID: 9302130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. AMS 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation in men with Peyronie's disease: comparison of CX and Ultrex cylinders.
    Montague DK; Angermeier KW; Lakin MM; Ingleright BJ
    J Urol; 1996 Nov; 156(5):1633-5. PubMed ID: 8863557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cylinder aneurysm of parylene-coated American Medical System (AMS) 700CX penile prosthesis.
    Kaufman JM; Weldon TE
    J Sex Med; 2008 Nov; 5(11):2713-5. PubMed ID: 18761594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical reliability of AMS 700 CX improved by parylene coating.
    Salem EA; Wilson SK; Neeb A; Delk JR; Cleves MA
    J Sex Med; 2009 Sep; 6(9):2615-20. PubMed ID: 19619145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term survival of inflatable penile prostheses: single surgical group experience with 2,384 first-time implants spanning two decades.
    Wilson SK; Delk JR; Salem EA; Cleves MA
    J Sex Med; 2007 Jul; 4(4 Pt 1):1074-9. PubMed ID: 17627751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical failure of the American Medical Systems Ultrex inflatable penile prosthesis: before and after 1993 structural modification.
    Milbank AJ; Montague DK; Angermeier KW; Lakin MM; Worley SE
    J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2502-6. PubMed ID: 11992067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative evaluation of physical characteristics of different inflatable penile prostheses.
    Barboglio Romo P; Chikkatur HP; Beldona S; Yi Y; Bruns TM; Malaeb BS
    Scand J Urol; 2017 Oct; 51(5):420-425. PubMed ID: 28738732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between AMS 700™ CX and Coloplast™ Titan inflatable penile prosthesis for Peyronie's disease treatment and remodeling: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.
    Chung E; Solomon M; DeYoung L; Brock GB
    J Sex Med; 2013 Nov; 10(11):2855-60. PubMed ID: 23210973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term infection outcomes after original antibiotic impregnated inflatable penile prosthesis implants: up to 7.7 years of followup.
    Carson CC; Mulcahy JJ; Harsch MR
    J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):614-8. PubMed ID: 21168870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrex cylinders: problems with uncontrolled lengthening (the S-shaped deformity).
    Wilson SK; Cleves MA; Delk JR
    J Urol; 1996 Jan; 155(1):135-7. PubMed ID: 7490811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term infection outcomes of 3-piece antibiotic impregnated penile prostheses used in replacement implant surgery.
    Nehra A; Carson CC; Chapin AK; Ginkel AM
    J Urol; 2012 Sep; 188(3):899-903. PubMed ID: 22819402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AMS 700CX/CXM inflatable penile prosthesis has high mechanical reliability at long-term follow-up.
    Kim DS; Yang KM; Chung HJ; Choi HM; Choi YD; Choi HK
    J Sex Med; 2010 Jul; 7(7):2602-7. PubMed ID: 20384938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inflatable penile prosthesis as tissue expander: what is the evidence?
    Chung PH; Siegel JA; Tausch TJ; Klein AK; Scott JM; Morey AF
    Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 28537700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk of infection with an antibiotic coated penile prosthesis at device replacement for mechanical failure.
    Abouassaly R; Angermeier KW; Montague DK
    J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2471-3. PubMed ID: 17085132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical Studies of the Inflatable Penile Prosthesis: A Review.
    Madiraju SK; Wallen JJ; Rydelek SP; Carrion RE; Perito PE; Hakky TS
    Sex Med Rev; 2019 Apr; 7(2):369-375. PubMed ID: 30655195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term mechanical reliability of multicomponent inflatable penile prosthesis: comparison of device survival.
    Dubocq F; Tefilli MV; Gheiler EL; Li H; Dhabuwala CB
    Urology; 1998 Aug; 52(2):277-81. PubMed ID: 9697794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implantation of AMS 700 LGX penile prosthesis preserves penile length without the need for penile lengthening procedures.
    Negro CL; Paradiso M; Rocca A; Bardari F
    Asian J Androl; 2016; 18(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 26112480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intermediate term assessment of the reliability, function and patient satisfaction with the AMS700 Ultrex penile prosthesis.
    Holloway FB; Farah RN
    J Urol; 1997 May; 157(5):1687-91. PubMed ID: 9112506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combined inflatable penile prosthesis-artificial urinary sphincter implantation: no increased risk of adverse events compared to single or staged device implantation.
    Segal RL; Cabrini MR; Harris ED; Mostwin JL; Bivalacqua TJ; Burnett AL
    J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2183-8. PubMed ID: 23831315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.