21 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23846295)
1. Performance of chromID Clostridium difficile agar compared with BBL C. difficile selective agar for detection of C. difficile in stool specimens.
Han SB; Chang J; Shin SH; Park KG; Lee GD; Park YG; Park YJ
Ann Lab Med; 2014 Sep; 34(5):376-9. PubMed ID: 25187891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biogeographic distribution and molecular epidemiology of
Cautivo-Reyes K; Knight DR; Bowie D; Moreira-Grez B; Whiteley AS; Riley TV
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2023 Oct; 89(10):e0037923. PubMed ID: 37823643
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. High Prevalence of Clostridium difficile in Home Gardens in Western Australia.
Shivaperumal N; Chang BJ; Riley TV
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2020 Dec; 87(1):. PubMed ID: 33097511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human
Mc Govern AM; Foster NF; Pereira LA; Knight DR; Elliott B; Chang BJ; Riley TV
JMM Case Rep; 2016 Aug; 3(4):e005062. PubMed ID: 28348781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of enzyme immunoassays and rapid diagnostic tests for clostridium difficile glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin a + B to toxinogenic culture on a highly selective chromogenic medium.
Olling A; Leidinger H; Hoffmann R
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2016 Oct; 35(10):1655-9. PubMed ID: 27323765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Isolation and Identification of Clostridium difficile Using ChromID C. difficile Medium Combined With Gram Staining and PRO Disc Testing: A Proposal for a Simple Culture Process.
Park KS; Ki CS; Lee NY
Ann Lab Med; 2015 Jul; 35(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 26131411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laboratory detection of Clostridium difficile in piglets in Australia.
Knight DR; Squire MM; Riley TV
J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Nov; 52(11):3856-62. PubMed ID: 25122859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of ChromID C. difficile agar and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar for the recovery of Clostridium difficile.
Boseiwaqa LV; Foster NF; Thean SK; Squire MM; Riley TV; Carson KC
Pathology; 2013 Aug; 45(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 23846295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Isolation of Clostridium difficile from faecal specimens--a comparison of chromID C. difficile agar and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar.
Carson KC; Boseiwaqa LV; Thean SK; Foster NF; Riley TV
J Med Microbiol; 2013 Sep; 62(Pt 9):1423-1427. PubMed ID: 23579394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Isolation and quantitation of Clostridium difficile in aqueous and fecal matter using two types of selective media.
Housman ST; Banevicius MA; Lamb LM; Nicolau DP
J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2016 Jun; 49(3):445-7. PubMed ID: 26198865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved recovery of Clostridium difficile spores with the incorporation of synthetic taurocholate in cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA).
Foster NF; Riley TV
Pathology; 2012 Jun; 44(4):354-6. PubMed ID: 22531346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of selective media for optimal recovery of Clostridium difficile from diarrhoeal stools.
Niyogi SK; Pal SC
Indian J Med Res; 1992 Jul; 95():181-3. PubMed ID: 1398806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA) and taurocholate-CCFA for recovery of Clostridium difficile during surveillance of hospitalized patients.
Bliss DZ; Johnson S; Clabots CR; Savik K; Gerding DN
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1997 Sep; 29(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 9350408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
