These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Validity and reproducibility of multi-test skin test device. Mahan C; Spectror S; Siegel S; Rachelefsky G; Katz R; Rohr A Ann Allergy; 1993 Jul; 71(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 8328708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of three prick test methods with the intradermal test and with the rast in the diagnosis of mite allergy. Ménardo JL; Bousquet J; Michel FB Ann Allergy; 1982 Apr; 48(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 7073028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of the skin pathergy test with blunt and sharp needles in Behçet's disease: confirmed specificity but decreased sensitivity with sharp needles. Dilşen N; Koniçe M; Aral O; Ocal L; Inanç M; Gül A Ann Rheum Dis; 1993 Nov; 52(11):823-5. PubMed ID: 8250614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of six epicutaneous devices in the performance of immediate hypersensitivity skin testing. Adinoff AD; Rosloniec DM; McCall LL; Nelson HS J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1989 Aug; 84(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 2760359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Atopic skin test re-evaluated. X. Comparison of a perfected technique of intracutaneous skin testing and the prick test performed with a modified Morrow Brown Needle. Nierop G; Voorhorst R; De Vijver RL Ann Allergy; 1981 Feb; 46(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 7469129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of five techniques of skin prick tests used routinely in Europe. Masse MS; Granger Vallée A; Chiriac A; Dhivert-Donnadieu H; Bousquet-Rouanet L; Bousquet PJ; Demoly P Allergy; 2011 Nov; 66(11):1415-9. PubMed ID: 21797883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performances of an improved device for skin prick tests. Caimmi D; Masse MS; Chiriac AM; Demoly P Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol; 2013; 26(1):235-7. PubMed ID: 23527727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multi-Test skin testing in allergy: a review of published findings. Kniker WT Ann Allergy; 1993 Nov; 71(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 8250356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety evaluation and consideration of 4 Pin Multi-needle for meso-therapy. Kim JT; Choi A; Jeong JH; Jo JH; Ryu OS; Kim EJ; Kim KY; Song MH; Song YH; Shin WS; Lee SS Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(S1):291-306. PubMed ID: 29710757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility of patch test results: comparison of TRUE Test and Finn Chamber test results. Gollhausen R; Przybilla B; Ring J J Am Acad Dermatol; 1989 Oct; 21(4 Pt 2):843-6. PubMed ID: 2600211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the sensitivity and precision of four skin test devices. Engler DB; DeJarnatt AC; Sim TC; Lee JL; Grant JA J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1992 Dec; 90(6 Pt 1):985-91. PubMed ID: 1460202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of application of multiple needle pricks on the pathergy reaction. Ozdemir M; Bodur S; Engin B; Baysal I Int J Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 47(4):335-8. PubMed ID: 18377594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Prick test in Behçet's disease (author's transl)]. Matsubara T; Eryu Y; Fukushiro R Nihon Hifuka Gakkai Zasshi; 1974 Nov; 84(11):517-22. PubMed ID: 4549078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of distance between sites and region of the body on results of skin prick tests. Nelson HS; Knoetzer J; Bucher B J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1996 Feb; 97(2):596-601. PubMed ID: 8621844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of 4 skin prick tests to detect immediate hypersensitivity]. Ortega Cisneros M; Ramos García BC; del Río Navarro BE; Sienra Monge JJ Rev Alerg Mex; 1998; 45(2):36-42. PubMed ID: 9650494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]