These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2384708)

  • 21. The output characteristics of an implanted bone conduction prosthesis.
    Gatehouse S; Browning GG
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1990 Dec; 15(6):503-13. PubMed ID: 2073757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patient Outcomes in Magnet-Based Implantable Auditory Assist Devices.
    O'Niel MB; Runge CL; Friedland DR; Kerschner JE
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jun; 140(6):513-20. PubMed ID: 24763485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An implantable bone conduction hearing device.
    Johnson R; Meikle M; Vernon J; Schleuning A
    Am J Otol; 1988 Dec; 9 Suppl():93-100. PubMed ID: 3202143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A functional and anatomical comparison between two passive transcutaneous bone conduction implants in children.
    Giannantonio S; Scorpecci A; Pacifico C; Marsella P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():202-207. PubMed ID: 29605355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Unilateral sensorineural hearing loss rehabilitation.
    Welling DB; Glasscock ME; Woods CI; Sheffey RC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1991 Dec; 105(6):771-6. PubMed ID: 1787965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Estimation of the benefit of bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Browning GG; Gatehouse S
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1994 Nov; 103(11):872-8. PubMed ID: 7979001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Non-implantable bone conduction device for hearing loss: a systematic review.
    Moffa A; Giorgi L; Cassano M; Rinaldi V; Natalizia A; Bressi F; Guglielmelli E; Casale M
    J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2020; 34(5 Suppl. 3):97-110. Technology in Medicine. PubMed ID: 33386039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bone conduction implants: Xomed Audiant bone conductor vs. BAHA.
    Negri S; Bernath O; Häusler R
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1997 Jun; 76(6):394-6. PubMed ID: 9210806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Indication criteria and outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant.
    Riss D; Arnoldner C; Baumgartner WD; Blineder M; Flak S; Bachner A; Gstoettner W; Hamzavi JS
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Dec; 124(12):2802-6. PubMed ID: 25142577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Preoperative headband assessment for semi-implantable bone conduction hearing devices in conductive hearing loss: is it useful or misleading?
    Rainsbury JW; Williams BA; Gulliver M; Morris DP
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):e58-62. PubMed ID: 25548890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Partially implantable bone conduction hearing aids without a percutaneous abutment (Otomag): technique and preliminary clinical results.
    Siegert R
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 71():41-46. PubMed ID: 21389703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Bone anchored hearing aids (Audiant): long-term use].
    Whitehead E
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1995; 116(4):301-3. PubMed ID: 8927834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of Carina active middle-ear implant with conventional hearing aids for mixed hearing loss.
    Savaş VA; Gündüz B; Karamert R; Cevizci R; Düzlü M; Tutar H; Bayazit YA
    J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Apr; 130(4):340-3. PubMed ID: 26991874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Strategies of active middle ear implants for hearing rehabilitation in congenital aural atresia.
    Verhaert N; Fuchsmann C; Tringali S; Lina-Granade G; Truy E
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):639-45. PubMed ID: 21436753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Retrospective audiological analysis of bone conduction versus round window vibratory stimulation in patients with mixed hearing loss.
    Mojallal H; Schwab B; Hinze AL; Giere T; Lenarz T
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 25735204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Bone Conduction Implantable Device as a Functional Treatment Option in Unilateral Microtia with Bilateral Stapes Ankylosis: A Report of Two Cases.
    Zanetti D; Di Berardino F
    Am J Case Rep; 2018 Jan; 19():82-89. PubMed ID: 29358571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Active transcutaneous bone conduction implant: audiological results in paediatric patients with bilateral microtia associated with external auditory canal atresia.
    Bravo-Torres S; Der-Mussa C; Fuentes-López E
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 28857620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Sophono bone-conduction system: Surgical, audiologic, and quality-of-life outcomes.
    Mclean T; Pai I; Philipatos A; Gordon M
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Jul; 96(7):E28-E33. PubMed ID: 28719716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sound transmission by cartilage conduction in ear with fibrotic aural atresia.
    Morimoto C; Nishimura T; Hosoi H; Saito O; Fukuda F; Shimokura R; Yamanaka T
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(2):325-32. PubMed ID: 24933730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.