These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23847223)
1. Are centers and practices implementing changes to their reimbursement or payment models? An NCCN Trends report. Guinto JB J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2013 Jul; 11(7):904-5. PubMed ID: 23847223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An oncologist's perspective: preparation for new payment models in cancer care. Apte SM Am J Manag Care; 2017 Apr; 23(5 Spec No.):SP169-SP172. PubMed ID: 28665674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Making sense of advanced payment models. McAneny B; Grubbs SS; Birch W; Sayam Zuckerman D Am J Manag Care; 2017 Apr; 23(5 Spec No.):SP199-SP200. PubMed ID: 28665679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How to create successful alternative payment models in oncology. Miller HD Am J Manag Care; 2017 Apr; 23(5 Spec No.):SP160-SP163. PubMed ID: 28665673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Squaring value-based payment with innovation in oncology. Caffrey M Am J Manag Care; 2018 Oct; 24(12 Spec No.):SP482-SP484. PubMed ID: 30550253 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Value-based payment models in oncology: will they help or hinder patient access to new treatments? Shah S; Reh G Am J Manag Care; 2017 Apr; 23(5 Spec No.):SP188-SP190. PubMed ID: 28665677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reimbursement trends in clinical oncology: payment and quality issues. Shalowitz JI Cancer Invest; 1989; 7(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 2790542 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reimbursement: current status and future outlook. Bailes JS Semin Oncol; 1994 Aug; 21(4 Suppl 7):118-22. PubMed ID: 8091237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The long battle over payment for oncology services in the office setting. Bailes JS; Coleman TS J Oncol Pract; 2014 Jan; 10(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 24443726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Managed care & medical oncology: the focus is on value. Danielson E; Demartino J; Mullen JA J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2010 Sep; 8 Suppl 7():S28-37. PubMed ID: 20947721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. AAFP challenges payment inequities in primary care, oncology initiatives. Am Fam Physician; 2015 May; 91(9):598. PubMed ID: 25955732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Canada develops models of teleoncology. Palkhivala A J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Nov; 103(21):1566-8. PubMed ID: 22010180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of reimbursement and health care reform on the ambulatory oncology setting. Xistris DM; Houlihan NG Semin Oncol Nurs; 1994 Nov; 10(4):281-7. PubMed ID: 7855455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A conversation with Lee N. Newcomer, MD, MHA. Payments with purpose. Interview by John Marcille. Newcomer LN Manag Care; 2011 Dec; 20(12):36-40. PubMed ID: 22259875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reforming the payment system for medical oncology. Bach PB JAMA; 2013 Jul; 310(3):261-2. PubMed ID: 23817729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. State of Cancer Care in America: Reflections on an Inaugural Year. Polite BN; Seid JE; Freeman M; Levit LA; Kirkwood MK; Schenkel C; Bruinooge SS; Schilsky RL J Oncol Pract; 2019 Apr; 15(4):163-165. PubMed ID: 30856037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Oncologist practice consolidation continues: driven by changes in reimbursement and standards of care, independent community oncology practices continue to dwindle. Ullman K Am J Manag Care; 2012 Dec; 18(5 Spec No.):SP236. PubMed ID: 23437476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Guidance of healthcare development for metastatic cancer patients as an example for setting incentives. Haier J; Sleeman J; Schäfers J Clin Exp Metastasis; 2020 Feb; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 31845033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]