BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23847252)

  • 1. Model-based iterative reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal CT: comparison of image quality in the detection of colorectal liver metastases.
    Volders D; Bols A; Haspeslagh M; Coenegrachts K
    Radiology; 2013 Nov; 269(2):469-74. PubMed ID: 23847252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
    Shuman WP; Chan KT; Busey JM; Mitsumori LM; Choi E; Koprowicz KM; Kanal KM
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1715-23. PubMed ID: 26037266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Hsieh J; Licato PE; Do S; Pien HH; Blake MA
    Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Detection of Focal Liver Lesions Using Abdominal CT: A Comparison of Image Quality Between Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction V and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction.
    Lee S; Kwon H; Cho J
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Dec; 23(12):1532-1538. PubMed ID: 27745816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduced Radiation Dose with Model-based Iterative Reconstruction versus Standard Dose with Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction in Abdominal CT for Diagnosis of Acute Renal Colic.
    Fontarensky M; Alfidja A; Perignon R; Schoenig A; Perrier C; Mulliez A; Guy L; Boyer L
    Radiology; 2015 Jul; 276(1):156-66. PubMed ID: 25848899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
    Katsura M; Matsuda I; Akahane M; Sato J; Akai H; Yasaka K; Kunimatsu A; Ohtomo K
    Eur Radiol; 2012 Aug; 22(8):1613-23. PubMed ID: 22538629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of Filtered Back Projection, Adaptive Statistical, and Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction for Reduced Dose Abdominal Computed Tomography.
    Padole A; Singh S; Lira D; Blake MA; Pourjabbar S; Khawaja RD; Choy G; Saini S; Do S; Kalra MK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):462-7. PubMed ID: 25734468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Application of a New Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction in Low-Dose Upper Abdominal CT.
    Jia Y; Zhai B; He T; Yu Y; Yu N; Duan H; Yang C; Zhang X
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):e275-e283. PubMed ID: 30660470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
    Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients.
    Vardhanabhuti V; Riordan RD; Mitchell GR; Hyde C; Roobottom CA
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging.
    Pickhardt PJ; Lubner MG; Kim DH; Tang J; Ruma JA; del Rio AM; Chen GH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1266-74. PubMed ID: 23169718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Model-based iterative reconstruction versus adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection in liver 64-MDCT: focal lesion detection, lesion conspicuity, and image noise.
    Shuman WP; Green DE; Busey JM; Kolokythas O; Mitsumori LM; Koprowicz KM; Thibault JB; Hsieh J; Alessio AM; Choi E; Kinahan PE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 May; 200(5):1071-6. PubMed ID: 23617492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation dose reduction with hybrid iterative reconstruction for pediatric CT.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Shenoy-Bhangle AS; Saini A; Gervais DA; Westra SJ; Thrall JH
    Radiology; 2012 May; 263(2):537-46. PubMed ID: 22517962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Iterative Reconstructions in Reduced-Dose CT: Which Type Ensures Diagnostic Image Quality in Young Oncology Patients?
    Pauchard B; Higashigaito K; Lamri-Senouci A; Knebel JF; Berthold D; Verdun FR; Alkadhi H; Schmidt S
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1114-1124. PubMed ID: 28365232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
    Deák Z; Grimm JM; Treitl M; Geyer LL; Linsenmaier U; Körner M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
    Sagara Y; Hara AK; Pavlicek W; Silva AC; Paden RG; Wu Q
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abdominal CT: an intra-individual comparison between virtual monochromatic spectral and polychromatic 120-kVp images obtained during the same examination.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Hosokawa T; Tanami Y; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 83(10):1715-22. PubMed ID: 25015416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deep learning imaging reconstruction of reduced-dose 40 keV virtual monoenergetic imaging for early detection of colorectal cancer liver metastases.
    Li S; Yuan L; Lu T; Yang X; Ren W; Wang L; Zhao J; Deng J; Liu X; Xue C; Sun Q; Zhang W; Zhou J
    Eur J Radiol; 2023 Nov; 168():111128. PubMed ID: 37816301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.