These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23848066)

  • 21. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth restored with glass fibre bundles.
    Rodrigues FB; Paranhos MP; Spohr AM; Oshima HM; Carlini B; Burnett LH
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):356-62. PubMed ID: 20518927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth, with variable marginal ridge thicknesses, restored with composite resin and composite resin reinforced with Ribbond: an in vitro study.
    Kalburge V; Yakub SS; Kalburge J; Hiremath H; Chandurkar A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 23965445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
    Sengun A; Cobankara FK; Orucoglu H
    Dent Traumatol; 2008 Apr; 24(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18352927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In vitro comparison of endodontic posts in structurally compromised roots of maxillary incisors.
    Solomon CS; Osman YI
    SADJ; 2011 Jun; 66(5):220-3. PubMed ID: 23193862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
    Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques.
    Belli S; Erdemir A; Yildirim C
    Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 16454794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of coronal restorations on the fracture resistance of root canal-treated premolar and molar teeth: a retrospective study.
    Dammaschke T; Nykiel K; Sagheri D; Schäfer E
    Aust Endod J; 2013 Aug; 39(2):48-56. PubMed ID: 23890259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):724-30. PubMed ID: 19581032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fatigue resistance of teeth restored with cuspal-coverage composite restorations.
    Fennis WM; Kuijs RH; Kreulen CM; Verdonschot N; Creugers NH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 15237878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations.
    Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12744406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Static and fatigue fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with post-cores.
    Hayashi M; Sugeta A; Takahashi Y; Imazato S; Ebisu S
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1178-86. PubMed ID: 18374974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of posts on the fracture resistance of load-cycled endodontically-treated premolars restored with direct composite resin.
    Hajizadeh H; Namazikhah MS; Moghaddas MJ; Ghavamnasiri M; Majidinia S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):10-7. PubMed ID: 19430621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fracture resistance of roots filled with gutta-percha or RealSeal®.
    Lertchirakarn V; Poonkaew A; Messer H
    Int Endod J; 2011 Nov; 44(11):1005-10. PubMed ID: 21899563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fracture resistance of anterior teeth restored with a novel nonmetallic post.
    Abo El-Ela OA; Atta OA; El-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Jun; 74(5):441. PubMed ID: 18538068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of adhesive techniques on fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with various residual wall thicknesses.
    Scotti N; Rota R; Scansetti M; Paolino DS; Chiandussi G; Pasqualini D; Berutti E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 24095213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlay and resin composite: an in vitro study.
    Desai PD; Das UK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):877. PubMed ID: 22484893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of ceramic inlays and composite fillings on fracture resistance of premolars in vitro.
    Ragauska A; Apse P; Kasjanovs V; Berzina-Cimdina L
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(4):121-6. PubMed ID: 19223711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fracture resistance of composite resin restorations and porcelain veneers in relation to residual tooth structure in fractured incisors.
    Batalocco G; Lee H; Ercoli C; Feng C; Malmstrom H
    Dent Traumatol; 2012 Feb; 28(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 21752192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.