259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23849145)
1. Measure once, cut twice--adding patient-reported outcome measures to the electronic health record for comparative effectiveness research.
Wu AW; Kharrazi H; Boulware LE; Snyder CF
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S12-20. PubMed ID: 23849145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A model for incorporating patient and stakeholder voices in a learning health care network: Washington State's Comparative Effectiveness Research Translation Network.
Devine EB; Alfonso-Cristancho R; Devlin A; Edwards TC; Farrokhi ET; Kessler L; Lavallee DC; Patrick DL; Sullivan SD; Tarczy-Hornoch P; Yanez ND; Flum DR;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S122-9. PubMed ID: 23849146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Unlocking the research potential of the GP electronic care record.
Wallace P; Delaney B; Sullivan F
Br J Gen Pract; 2013 Jun; 63(611):284-5. PubMed ID: 23735377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Building electronic data infrastructure for comparative effectiveness research: accomplishments, lessons learned and future steps.
Randhawa GS
J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Nov; 3(6):567-72. PubMed ID: 25494561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Futurescapes: evidence expectations in the USA for comparative effectiveness research for drugs in 2020.
Messner DA; Mohr P; Towse A
J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Aug; 4(4):385-400. PubMed ID: 25730709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CER Hub: An informatics platform for conducting comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional, heterogeneous, electronic clinical data.
Hazlehurst BL; Kurtz SE; Masica A; Stevens VJ; McBurnie MA; Puro JE; Vijayadeva V; Au DH; Brannon ED; Sittig DF
Int J Med Inform; 2015 Oct; 84(10):763-73. PubMed ID: 26138036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Importance of health information technology, electronic health records, and continuously aggregating data to comparative effectiveness research and learning health care.
Miriovsky BJ; Shulman LN; Abernethy AP
J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4243-8. PubMed ID: 23071233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research.
Reeve BB; Wyrwich KW; Wu AW; Velikova G; Terwee CB; Snyder CF; Schwartz C; Revicki DA; Moinpour CM; McLeod LD; Lyons JC; Lenderking WR; Hinds PS; Hays RD; Greenhalgh J; Gershon R; Feeny D; Fayers PM; Cella D; Brundage M; Ahmed S; Aaronson NK; Butt Z
Qual Life Res; 2013 Oct; 22(8):1889-905. PubMed ID: 23288613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and Implementation of Clinical Outcome Measures for Automated Collection Within Specialty Pharmacy Practice.
Patel K; Chim YL; Grant J; Wascher M; Nathanson A; Canfield S
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2020 Jul; 26(7):901-909. PubMed ID: 32584676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. IT: key enabler of value-based care: data drives success.
Glaser J
Hosp Health Netw; 2013 May; 87(5):64. PubMed ID: 23814960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): putting the patient perspective in patient-centered outcomes research.
Snyder CF; Jensen RE; Segal JB; Wu AW
Med Care; 2013 Aug; 51(8 Suppl 3):S73-9. PubMed ID: 23774513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of technical advances in the adoption and integration of patient-reported outcomes in clinical care.
Jensen RE; Rothrock NE; DeWitt EM; Spiegel B; Tucker CA; Crane HM; Forrest CB; Patrick DL; Fredericksen R; Shulman LM; Cella D; Crane PK
Med Care; 2015 Feb; 53(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 25588135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reconceptualizing the Electronic Health Record for a New Decade: A Caring Technology?
Robichaux C; Tietze M; Stokes F; McBride S
ANS Adv Nurs Sci; 2019; 42(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 31299684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research.
Hersh WR; Weiner MG; Embi PJ; Logan JR; Payne PR; Bernstam EV; Lehmann HP; Hripcsak G; Hartzog TH; Cimino JJ; Saltz JH
Med Care; 2013 Aug; 51(8 Suppl 3):S30-7. PubMed ID: 23774517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electronic health records to facilitate clinical research.
Cowie MR; Blomster JI; Curtis LH; Duclaux S; Ford I; Fritz F; Goldman S; Janmohamed S; Kreuzer J; Leenay M; Michel A; Ong S; Pell JP; Southworth MR; Stough WG; Thoenes M; Zannad F; Zalewski A
Clin Res Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 106(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 27557678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Possible Sources of Bias in Primary Care Electronic Health Record Data Use and Reuse.
Verheij RA; Curcin V; Delaney BC; McGilchrist MM
J Med Internet Res; 2018 May; 20(5):e185. PubMed ID: 29844010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A tall order on a tight timeframe: stakeholder perspectives on comparative effectiveness research using electronic clinical data.
Holve E; Lopez MH; Scott L; Segal C
J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Sep; 1(5):441-51. PubMed ID: 24236421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wearable Health Technology and Electronic Health Record Integration: Scoping Review and Future Directions.
Dinh-Le C; Chuang R; Chokshi S; Mann D
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Sep; 7(9):e12861. PubMed ID: 31512582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the value of patient-generated data to comparative effectiveness research.
Howie L; Hirsch B; Locklear T; Abernethy AP
Health Aff (Millwood); 2014 Jul; 33(7):1220-8. PubMed ID: 25006149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
