These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23849260)

  • 1. A long-term morphometric analysis of auricular position post-otoplasty.
    Graham ME; Bezuhly M; Hong P
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1482-6. PubMed ID: 23849260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of two incisionless otoplasty techniques for prominent ears in children.
    Haytoglu S; Haytoglu TG; Bayar Muluk N; Kuran G; Arikan OK
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Apr; 79(4):504-10. PubMed ID: 25650142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrospective analysis of the Farrior technique for otoplasty.
    Scharer SA; Farrior EH; Farrior RT
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2007; 9(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 17519206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reducing Surgical Risks for Otoplasty.
    Hoshal SG; Morisada MV; Tollefson TT
    Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2023 May; 31(2):253-261. PubMed ID: 37001928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. External Mustarde suture technique in otoplasty revisited: a report of 82 cases.
    Eryilmaz T; Ozmen S; Cukurluoglu O; Sezgin B
    J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2013 Sep; 47(4):324-7. PubMed ID: 23547539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A long-term analysis of auricular position in pediatric patients who underwent post-auricular approaches.
    Hong P; Arseneault T; Makki F
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Mar; 78(3):471-3. PubMed ID: 24424294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of the effectiveness of the surgical technique with and without preservation of the conchal cartilage in otoplasty through the measure of the cephalo-auricular and scapho-conchal angles.
    Soares CMC; Nassif FDJM; Dranka D; Becker RV; Hurtado JM; Freitas RDS
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2023; 89(3):410-416. PubMed ID: 36754673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamometric Analysis of Normative Auricular Stiffness and Comparison With Operated Prominent Ears.
    Ozturan O; Dogan R; Ozucer B; Yildirim YS; Meric A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):2155-9. PubMed ID: 26468801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cartilage-Sparing Otoplasty: A New Approach.
    Benkler M; Weiss N; Egozi D; Dolgunin L; Kouniavski E
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Oct; 152(4):689e-692e. PubMed ID: 36912913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antihelical shaping of prominent ears using conchal cartilage-grafting adhesion.
    Park C; Jeong TW
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Jun; 122(6):1238-45. PubMed ID: 22549915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical Outcome and Patients' Satisfaction Study After Otoplasty Using Hybrid Techniques in Adult Patients.
    Choi JY; Jung SC; Sykes JM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 28(5):1278-1281. PubMed ID: 28582310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finesse in otoplasty in four steps.
    Ribeiro JA; da Silva GS
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):846-52. PubMed ID: 22678134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aesthetics of the auricle and its implications for otoplasty and auricular reconstruction.
    Klockars T; Mäkitie A; Rautio J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 76(9):1347-50. PubMed ID: 22763209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of Cartilage Scoring in Correction of Prominent Ear with Incisionless Otoplasty Technique in Pediatric Patients.
    Haytoğlu S; Haytoğlu TG; Kuran G; Yıldırım İ; Arıkan OK
    J Int Adv Otol; 2017 Apr; 13(1):21-27. PubMed ID: 27810844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Otoplasty: the case for skin incision by higher volume operators.
    Arkoulis N; Reid J; Neill CO; Stewart KJ
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):226-9. PubMed ID: 25465145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The posterior auricular muscle: a useful anatomical landmark for otoplasty.
    Stephen C; Lowrie AG
    J Laryngol Otol; 2017 May; 131(5):465-467. PubMed ID: 28264728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Splitted posterior auricular muscle flap combined with traditional otoplasty.
    Karaaslan O; Sonmez E; Silistreli OK; Can M; Caliskan G; Bedir YK
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1350-2. PubMed ID: 23851805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Cartilage-Scoring and Cartilage-Sparing Otoplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of Complications and Aesthetic Outcome of 1060 Ears.
    Smittenberg MN; Marsman M; Veeger NJGM; Moues CM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Apr; 141(4):500e-506e. PubMed ID: 29595722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Otoplasty in children less than four years of age: surgical technique.
    Gosain AK; Recinos RF
    J Craniofac Surg; 2002 Jul; 13(4):505-9. PubMed ID: 12140412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Otoplasty with an unusual cartilage scoring approach.
    Gümüş N; Yılmaz S
    J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2016; 50(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 26176319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.