109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23849738)
1. Simple dichotomous updating methods improved the validity of polytomous prediction models.
Van Hoorde K; Vergouwe Y; Timmerman D; Van Huffel S; Steyerberg EW; Van Calster B
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 66(10):1158-65. PubMed ID: 23849738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing calibration of multinomial risk prediction models.
Van Hoorde K; Vergouwe Y; Timmerman D; Van Huffel S; Steyerberg EW; Van Calster B
Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(15):2585-96. PubMed ID: 24549725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Polytomous diagnosis of ovarian tumors as benign, borderline, primary invasive or metastatic: development and validation of standard and kernel-based risk prediction models.
Van Calster B; Valentin L; Van Holsbeke C; Testa AC; Bourne T; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Oct; 10():96. PubMed ID: 20961457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Polytomous logistic regression analysis could be applied more often in diagnostic research.
Biesheuvel CJ; Vergouwe Y; Steyerberg EW; Grobbee DE; Moons KG
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 18177785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation and updating of risk models based on multinomial logistic regression.
Van Calster B; Van Hoorde K; Vergouwe Y; Bobdiwala S; Condous G; Kirk E; Bourne T; Steyerberg EW
Diagn Progn Res; 2017; 1():2. PubMed ID: 31093534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the discriminative ability of risk models for more than two outcome categories.
Van Calster B; Vergouwe Y; Looman CW; Van Belle V; Timmerman D; Steyerberg EW
Eur J Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 27(10):761-70. PubMed ID: 23054032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Updating methods improved the performance of a clinical prediction model in new patients.
Janssen KJ; Moons KG; Kalkman CJ; Grobbee DE; Vergouwe Y
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 61(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18083464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extending the c-statistic to nominal polytomous outcomes: the Polytomous Discrimination Index.
Van Calster B; Van Belle V; Vergouwe Y; Timmerman D; Van Huffel S; Steyerberg EW
Stat Med; 2012 Oct; 31(23):2610-26. PubMed ID: 22733650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methods for updating a risk prediction model for cardiac surgery: a statistical primer.
Siregar S; Nieboer D; Versteegh MIM; Steyerberg EW; Takkenberg JJM
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2019 Mar; 28(3):333-338. PubMed ID: 30608590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of model updating strategies on the performance of prevalent diabetes risk prediction models in a mixed-ancestry population of South Africa.
Masconi KL; Matsha TE; Erasmus RT; Kengne AP
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211528. PubMed ID: 30730899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A review of statistical updating methods for clinical prediction models.
Su TL; Jaki T; Hickey GL; Buchan I; Sperrin M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Jan; 27(1):185-197. PubMed ID: 27460537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A closed testing procedure to select an appropriate method for updating prediction models.
Vergouwe Y; Nieboer D; Oostenbrink R; Debray TPA; Murray GD; Kattan MW; Koffijberg H; Moons KGM; Steyerberg EW
Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(28):4529-4539. PubMed ID: 27891652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychometric properties for the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: dichotomous versus polytomous conventional and IRT scoring.
Vispoel WP; Kim HY
Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):878-91. PubMed ID: 24708082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A nonparametric updating method to correct clinical prediction model drift.
Davis SE; Greevy RA; Fonnesbeck C; Lasko TA; Walsh CG; Matheny ME
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2019 Dec; 26(12):1448-1457. PubMed ID: 31397478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Polytomous regression did not outperform dichotomous logistic regression in diagnosing serious bacterial infections in febrile children.
Roukema J; van Loenhout RB; Steyerberg EW; Moons KG; Bleeker SE; Moll HA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18177786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving prediction models with new markers: a comparison of updating strategies.
Nieboer D; Vergouwe Y; Ankerst DP; Roobol MJ; Steyerberg EW
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Sep; 16(1):128. PubMed ID: 27678479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methodological guidance for the evaluation and updating of clinical prediction models: a systematic review.
Binuya MAE; Engelhardt EG; Schats W; Schmidt MK; Steyerberg EW
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):316. PubMed ID: 36510134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using the dichotomous Rasch model to analyze polytomous items.
He Q; Wheadon C
J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 23442327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of dynamic updating strategies for clinical prediction models.
Schnellinger EM; Yang W; Kimmel SE
Diagn Progn Res; 2021 Dec; 5(1):20. PubMed ID: 34865652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Residual mass histology in testicular cancer: development and validation of a clinical prediction rule.
Steyerberg EW; Vergouwe Y; Keizer HJ; Habbema JD;
Stat Med; 2001 Dec; 20(24):3847-59. PubMed ID: 11782038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
