90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23849983)
1. The importance of the pose in three-dimensional imaging of the ptotic breast.
Henseler H; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1551-6. PubMed ID: 23849983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation into variation and errors of a three-dimensional breast imaging system using multiple stereo cameras.
Henseler H; Smith J; Bowman A; Khambay BS; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Dec; 65(12):e332-7. PubMed ID: 22766492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Kinect Recording System for objective three- and four-dimensional breast assessment with image overlays.
Henseler H; Bonkat SK; Vogt PM; Rosenhahn B
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Feb; 69(2):e27-34. PubMed ID: 26565080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the Kinect device as a new portable imaging system for three-dimensional breast assessment.
Henseler H; Kuznetsova A; Vogt P; Rosenhahn B
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Apr; 67(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 24513562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An analysis of pose in 3D stereophotogrammetry of the breast.
Hameeteman M; Verhulst AC; Maal TJ; Ulrich DJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Dec; 69(12):1609-1613. PubMed ID: 27693271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast volumetry using a three-dimensional surface assessment technique.
Koch MC; Adamietz B; Jud SM; Fasching PA; Haeberle L; Karbacher S; Veit K; Schulz-Wendtland R; Uder M; Beckmann MW; Bani MR; Heusinger K; Loehberg CR; Cavallaro A
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):847-55. PubMed ID: 21487916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Digital evaluation of breast symmetry with 3D scanning technique].
Liu CJ; Ji K; Sun JJ; Xin MQ; Mu DL; Mu LH; Luan J
Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 29(5):353-6. PubMed ID: 24409777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subjective versus objective assessment of breast reconstruction.
Henseler H; Smith J; Bowman A; Khambay BS; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 May; 66(5):634-9. PubMed ID: 23402935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Breast volume assessment based on 3D surface geometry: verification of the method using MR imaging].
Eder M; Schneider A; Feussner H; Zimmermann A; Höhnke C; Papadopulos NA; Kovacs L
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Jun; 53(3):112-21. PubMed ID: 18601619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigation into accuracy and reproducibility of a 3D breast imaging system using multiple stereo cameras.
Henseler H; Khambay BS; Bowman A; Smith J; Paul Siebert J; Oehler S; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 May; 64(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 20947459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical accuracy and reproducibility of Portrait 3D Surgical Simulation Platform in breast augmentation.
Mailey B; Freel A; Wong R; Pointer DT; Khoobehi K
Aesthet Surg J; 2013 Jan; 33(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 23220877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional scanning in women with large, ptotic breasts: implications for bra cup sizing and design.
Coltman CE; McGhee DE; Steele JR
Ergonomics; 2017 Mar; 60(3):439-445. PubMed ID: 27066812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recovering 3D human pose from monocular images.
Agarwal A; Triggs B
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2006 Jan; 28(1):44-58. PubMed ID: 16402618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of 3-dimensional imaging of the breast region with 3-dimensional laser scanners.
Kovacs L; Yassouridis A; Zimmermann A; Brockmann G; Wöhnl A; Blaschke M; Eder M; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Rosenberg R; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E
Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Mar; 56(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 16508349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional surface imaging for clinical trials: improved precision and reproducibility in circumference measurements of thighs and abdomens.
Weiss ET; Barzilai O; Brightman L; Chapas A; Hale E; Karen J; Bernstein L; Geronemus RG
Lasers Surg Med; 2009 Dec; 41(10):767-73. PubMed ID: 20014255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3D surface imaging of the human female torso in upright to supine positions.
Reece GP; Merchant F; Andon J; Khatam H; Ravi-Chandar K; Weston J; Fingeret MC; Lane C; Duncan K; Markey MK
Med Eng Phys; 2015 Apr; 37(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 25703742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging.
Kovacs L; Eder M; Hollweck R; Zimmermann A; Settles M; Schneider A; Udosic K; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E
Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Dec; 57(6):602-10. PubMed ID: 17122543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of a passive stereophotogrammetry system for imaging of the breast: a geometric analysis.
Catherwood T; McCaughan E; Greer E; Spence RA; McIntosh SA; Winder RJ
Med Eng Phys; 2011 Oct; 33(8):900-5. PubMed ID: 21382736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of skin tone on the accuracy of hybrid and passive stereophotogrammetry.
Wesselius TS; Verhulst AC; Xi T; Ulrich DJO; Maal TJJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Sep; 72(9):1564-1569. PubMed ID: 31229406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions.
Tepper OM; Small KH; Unger JG; Feldman DL; Kumar N; Choi M; Karp NS
Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):570-5. PubMed ID: 19387164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
