These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23849983)
1. The importance of the pose in three-dimensional imaging of the ptotic breast. Henseler H; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1551-6. PubMed ID: 23849983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation into variation and errors of a three-dimensional breast imaging system using multiple stereo cameras. Henseler H; Smith J; Bowman A; Khambay BS; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Dec; 65(12):e332-7. PubMed ID: 22766492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Kinect Recording System for objective three- and four-dimensional breast assessment with image overlays. Henseler H; Bonkat SK; Vogt PM; Rosenhahn B J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Feb; 69(2):e27-34. PubMed ID: 26565080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of the Kinect device as a new portable imaging system for three-dimensional breast assessment. Henseler H; Kuznetsova A; Vogt P; Rosenhahn B J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Apr; 67(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 24513562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An analysis of pose in 3D stereophotogrammetry of the breast. Hameeteman M; Verhulst AC; Maal TJ; Ulrich DJ J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Dec; 69(12):1609-1613. PubMed ID: 27693271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast volumetry using a three-dimensional surface assessment technique. Koch MC; Adamietz B; Jud SM; Fasching PA; Haeberle L; Karbacher S; Veit K; Schulz-Wendtland R; Uder M; Beckmann MW; Bani MR; Heusinger K; Loehberg CR; Cavallaro A Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):847-55. PubMed ID: 21487916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Digital evaluation of breast symmetry with 3D scanning technique]. Liu CJ; Ji K; Sun JJ; Xin MQ; Mu DL; Mu LH; Luan J Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 29(5):353-6. PubMed ID: 24409777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subjective versus objective assessment of breast reconstruction. Henseler H; Smith J; Bowman A; Khambay BS; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 May; 66(5):634-9. PubMed ID: 23402935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Breast volume assessment based on 3D surface geometry: verification of the method using MR imaging]. Eder M; Schneider A; Feussner H; Zimmermann A; Höhnke C; Papadopulos NA; Kovacs L Biomed Tech (Berl); 2008 Jun; 53(3):112-21. PubMed ID: 18601619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigation into accuracy and reproducibility of a 3D breast imaging system using multiple stereo cameras. Henseler H; Khambay BS; Bowman A; Smith J; Paul Siebert J; Oehler S; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 May; 64(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 20947459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical accuracy and reproducibility of Portrait 3D Surgical Simulation Platform in breast augmentation. Mailey B; Freel A; Wong R; Pointer DT; Khoobehi K Aesthet Surg J; 2013 Jan; 33(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 23220877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional scanning in women with large, ptotic breasts: implications for bra cup sizing and design. Coltman CE; McGhee DE; Steele JR Ergonomics; 2017 Mar; 60(3):439-445. PubMed ID: 27066812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recovering 3D human pose from monocular images. Agarwal A; Triggs B IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2006 Jan; 28(1):44-58. PubMed ID: 16402618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of 3-dimensional imaging of the breast region with 3-dimensional laser scanners. Kovacs L; Yassouridis A; Zimmermann A; Brockmann G; Wöhnl A; Blaschke M; Eder M; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Rosenberg R; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Mar; 56(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 16508349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional surface imaging for clinical trials: improved precision and reproducibility in circumference measurements of thighs and abdomens. Weiss ET; Barzilai O; Brightman L; Chapas A; Hale E; Karen J; Bernstein L; Geronemus RG Lasers Surg Med; 2009 Dec; 41(10):767-73. PubMed ID: 20014255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3D surface imaging of the human female torso in upright to supine positions. Reece GP; Merchant F; Andon J; Khatam H; Ravi-Chandar K; Weston J; Fingeret MC; Lane C; Duncan K; Markey MK Med Eng Phys; 2015 Apr; 37(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 25703742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging. Kovacs L; Eder M; Hollweck R; Zimmermann A; Settles M; Schneider A; Udosic K; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E Ann Plast Surg; 2006 Dec; 57(6):602-10. PubMed ID: 17122543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of a passive stereophotogrammetry system for imaging of the breast: a geometric analysis. Catherwood T; McCaughan E; Greer E; Spence RA; McIntosh SA; Winder RJ Med Eng Phys; 2011 Oct; 33(8):900-5. PubMed ID: 21382736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of skin tone on the accuracy of hybrid and passive stereophotogrammetry. Wesselius TS; Verhulst AC; Xi T; Ulrich DJO; Maal TJJ J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Sep; 72(9):1564-1569. PubMed ID: 31229406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D analysis of breast augmentation defines operative changes and their relationship to implant dimensions. Tepper OM; Small KH; Unger JG; Feldman DL; Kumar N; Choi M; Karp NS Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):570-5. PubMed ID: 19387164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]