BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

890 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23851059)

  • 1. Clinical outcomes with synchronized left ventricular pacing: analysis of the adaptive CRT trial.
    Birnie D; Lemke B; Aonuma K; Krum H; Lee KL; Gasparini M; Starling RC; Milasinovic G; Gorcsan J; Houmsse M; Abeyratne A; Sambelashvili A; Martin DO
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 Sep; 10(9):1368-74. PubMed ID: 23851059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of a novel algorithm for synchronized left-ventricular pacing and ambulatory optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of the adaptive CRT trial.
    Martin DO; Lemke B; Birnie D; Krum H; Lee KL; Aonuma K; Gasparini M; Starling RC; Milasinovic G; Rogers T; Sambelashvili A; Gorcsan J; Houmsse M;
    Heart Rhythm; 2012 Nov; 9(11):1807-14. PubMed ID: 22796472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical response with adaptive CRT algorithm compared with CRT with echocardiography-optimized atrioventricular delay: a retrospective analysis of multicentre trials.
    Singh JP; Abraham WT; Chung ES; Rogers T; Sambelashvili A; Coles JA; Martin DO
    Europace; 2013 Nov; 15(11):1622-8. PubMed ID: 24014804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Left ventricular-only pacing in heart failure patients with normal atrioventricular conduction improves global function and left ventricular regional mechanics compared with biventricular pacing: an adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy sub-study.
    Burns KV; Gage RM; Curtin AE; Gorcsan J; Bank AJ
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2017 Oct; 19(10):1335-1343. PubMed ID: 28653458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design and results of aCRT MID-Q study: Adoption of adaptive CRT in patients with normal AV conduction and moderately wide left bundle branch block.
    Yamasaki H; Sekiguchi Y; Gosho M; Nogami A; Aonuma K;
    J Cardiol; 2020 Mar; 75(3):330-336. PubMed ID: 31492516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch pacing vs. optimized biventricular pacing with adaptive algorithm in heart failure with left bundle branch block: a prospective, multi-centre, observational study.
    Chen X; Ye Y; Wang Z; Jin Q; Qiu Z; Wang J; Qin S; Bai J; Wang W; Liang Y; Chen H; Sheng X; Gao F; Zhao X; Fu G; Ellenbogen KA; Su Y; Ge J
    Europace; 2022 May; 24(5):807-816. PubMed ID: 34718539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptive CRT in patients with normal AV conduction and left bundle branch block: Does QRS duration matter?
    Yamasaki H; Lustgarten D; Cerkvenik J; Birnie D; Gasparini M; Lee KL; Sekiguchi Y; Varma N; Lemke B; Starling RC; Aonuma K
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Aug; 240():297-301. PubMed ID: 28416247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Continuous optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients: Results of the Adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Trial.
    Birnie D; Hudnall H; Lemke B; Aonuma K; Lee KL; Gasparini M; Gorcsan J; Cerkvenik J; Martin DO
    Heart Rhythm; 2017 Dec; 14(12):1820-1825. PubMed ID: 28893549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of synchronized left ventricular pacing rate on risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias after cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure.
    Okajima T; Inden Y; Yanagisawa S; Suga K; Shimojo M; Nakagomi T; Tsurumi N; Watanabe R; Suzuki N; Shibata R; Murohara T
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2022 Oct; 65(1):239-249. PubMed ID: 35739437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Atrioventricular delay programming and the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy in MADIT-CRT.
    Brenyo A; Kutyifa V; Moss AJ; Mathias A; Barsheshet A; Pouleur AC; Knappe D; McNitt S; Polonsky B; Huang DT; Solomon SD; Zareba W; Goldenberg I
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 Aug; 10(8):1136-43. PubMed ID: 23712031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Left ventricular-only fusion pacing versus cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients: A randomized controlled trial.
    Su Y; Hua W; Shen F; Zou J; Tang B; Chen K; Liang Y; He L; Zhou X; Zhang X; Lu H; Zhang S
    Clin Cardiol; 2021 Sep; 44(9):1225-1232. PubMed ID: 34342026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel algorithm for individualized cardiac resynchronization therapy: rationale and design of the adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy trial.
    Krum H; Lemke B; Birnie D; Lee KL; Aonuma K; Starling RC; Gasparini M; Gorcsan J; Rogers T; Sambelashvili A; Kalmes A; Martin D
    Am Heart J; 2012 May; 163(5):747-752.e1. PubMed ID: 22607850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Continuously adjusting CRT therapy: clinical impact of adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Houmsse M; Abraham WT
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2014 May; 12(5):541-8. PubMed ID: 24678730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longer right to left ventricular activation delay at cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation is associated with improved clinical outcome in left bundle branch block patients.
    Kosztin A; Kutyifa V; Nagy VK; Geller L; Zima E; Molnar L; Szilagyi S; Ozcan EE; Szeplaki G; Merkely B
    Europace; 2016 Apr; 18(4):550-9. PubMed ID: 26116830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of synchronized left ventricular pacing rate over biventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Miyazaki Y; Ishibashi K; Ueda N; Oka S; Wakamiya A; Shimamoto K; Nakajima K; Kamakura T; Wada M; Inoue Y; Miyamoto K; Nagase S; Aiba T; Kusano K
    J Cardiol; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38679318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Real-world behavior of CRT pacing using the AdaptivCRT algorithm on patient outcomes: Effect on mortality and atrial fibrillation incidence.
    Singh JP; Cha YM; Lunati M; Chung ES; Li S; Smeets P; O'Donnell D
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Apr; 31(4):825-833. PubMed ID: 32009263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Whether noninvasive optimization of AV and VV delays improves the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Urbanek B; Chudzik M; Klimczak A; Rosiak M; Lewek J; Wranicz JK
    Cardiol J; 2013; 20(4):411-7. PubMed ID: 23913460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Novel Device-Based Algorithm Provides Optimal Hemodynamics During Exercise in Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
    Kasagawa A; Nakajima I; Izumo M; Nakayama Y; Yamada M; Takano M; Matsuda H; Furukawa T; Miyazaki H; Harada T; Akashi YJ
    Circ J; 2019 Sep; 83(10):2002-2009. PubMed ID: 31462585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of adaptive left bundle branch-optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy: a single centre experience.
    Feng XF; Yang LC; Zhao Y; Yu YC; Liu B; Li YG
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2022 Aug; 22(1):360. PubMed ID: 35933334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of Left Ventricular vs Biventricular Pacing on Reverse Remodelling: Insights From the Evaluation of Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure (EARTH) Trial.
    Skaf S; Thibault B; Khairy P; O'Meara E; Fortier A; Vakulenko HV; Pitre C; White M; Ducharme A;
    Can J Cardiol; 2017 Oct; 33(10):1274-1282. PubMed ID: 28941607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.