127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23851149)
1. Geographic access to mammography screening centre and participation of women in the Quebec Breast Cancer Screening Programme.
St-Jacques S; Philibert MD; Langlois A; Daigle JM; Pelletier E; Major D; Brisson J
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2013 Oct; 67(10):861-7. PubMed ID: 23851149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast cancer stage at diagnosis and geographic access to mammography screening (New Hampshire, 1998-2004).
Celaya MO; Berke EM; Onega TL; Gui J; Riddle BL; Cherala SS; Rees JR
Rural Remote Health; 2010; 10(2):1361. PubMed ID: 20438282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Socioeconomic deprivation, travel distance, location of service, and uptake of breast cancer screening in North Derbyshire, UK.
Maheswaran R; Pearson T; Jordan H; Black D
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2006 Mar; 60(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 16476749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Longitudinal patterns of breast cancer screening: mammography, clinical, and breast self-examinations in a rural and urban setting.
Leung J; McKenzie S; Martin J; Dobson A; McLaughlin D
Womens Health Issues; 2014; 24(1):e139-46. PubMed ID: 24439940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Breast cancer screening in thirteen French departments].
Ouédraogo S; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Roussot A; Dialla PO; Pornet C; Poillot ML; Soler-Michel P; Sarlin N; Lunaud P; Desmidt P; Paré E; Mathis C; Rymzhanova R; Kuntz-Huon J; Exbrayat C; Bataillard A; Régnier V; Kalecinski J; Quantin C; Dumas A; Gentil J; Amiel P; Chauvin F; Dancourt V; Arveux P
Bull Cancer; 2015 Feb; 102(2):126-38. PubMed ID: 25636359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Geographical and seasonal barriers to mammography services and breast cancer stage at diagnosis.
Onitilo AA; Liang H; Stankowski RV; Engel JM; Broton M; Doi SA; Miskowiak DA
Rural Remote Health; 2014; 14(3):2738. PubMed ID: 25018129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Travel time and participation in breast cancer screening in a region with high population dispersion].
Borda A; Sanz B; Otero L; Blasco T; García-Gómez FJ; de Andrés F
Gac Sanit; 2011; 25(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 21334790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. European transnational ecological deprivation index and participation in population-based breast cancer screening programmes in France.
Ouédraogo S; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Roussot A; Pornet C; Sarlin N; Lunaud P; Desmidt P; Quantin C; Chauvin F; Dancourt V; Arveux P
Prev Med; 2014 Jun; 63():103-8. PubMed ID: 24345603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammography screening: views from women and primary care physicians in Crete.
Trigoni M; Griffiths F; Tsiftsis D; Koumantakis E; Green E; Lionis C
BMC Womens Health; 2008 Nov; 8():20. PubMed ID: 18990253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of mammography accessibility, deprivation and spatial effect in breast cancer screening participation in France: an observational ecological study.
Prajapati N; Soler-Michel P; Vieira VM; Padilla CM
Int J Health Geogr; 2022 Dec; 21(1):21. PubMed ID: 36566241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Could mobile mammography reduce social and geographic inequalities in breast cancer screening participation?
Guillaume E; Launay L; Dejardin O; Bouvier V; Guittet L; Déan P; Notari A; De Mil R; Launoy G
Prev Med; 2017 Jul; 100():84-88. PubMed ID: 28408217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does distance matter? Distance to mammography facilities and stage at diagnosis of breast cancer in Kentucky.
Huang B; Dignan M; Han D; Johnson O
J Rural Health; 2009; 25(4):366-71. PubMed ID: 19780916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distance to screening site and non-participation in screening for breast cancer: a population-based study.
Jensen LF; Pedersen AF; Andersen B; Fenger-Grøn M; Vedsted P
J Public Health (Oxf); 2014 Jun; 36(2):292-9. PubMed ID: 23885026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of access factors on breast screening attendance on two Scottish islands.
Stark CR; Reay L; Shiroyama C
Health Bull (Edinb); 1997 Sep; 55(5):316-21. PubMed ID: 11769111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Disparities in receipt of breast and cervical cancer screening for rural women age 18 to 64 with disabilities.
Horner-Johnson W; Dobbertin K; Iezzoni LI
Womens Health Issues; 2015; 25(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 25864023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammography rates for breast cancer screening: a comparison of First Nations women and all other women living in Manitoba, Canada, 1999-2008.
Demers AA; Decker KM; Kliewer EV; Musto G; Shu E; Biswanger N; Fradette K; Elias B; Griffith J; Turner D
Prev Chronic Dis; 2015 May; 12():E82. PubMed ID: 26020546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast and cervical carcinoma screening practices among women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1998-1999.
Coughlin SS; Thompson TD; Hall HI; Logan P; Uhler RJ
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 94(11):2801-12. PubMed ID: 12115366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in geographic accessibility to mammography by state and rural-urban status, United States, 2006-2022.
Wiese D; Islami F; Henry KA
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2023 Mar; 115(3):337-340. PubMed ID: 36515214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
