128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23851149)
21. Impact of geography on mammography use in California.
Jackson MC; Davis WW; Waldron W; McNeel TS; Pfeiffer R; Breen N
Cancer Causes Control; 2009 Oct; 20(8):1339-53. PubMed ID: 19449107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Rural-Urban Disparities in Access to Breast Cancer Screening: A Spatial Clustering Analysis.
Chandak A; Nayar P; Lin G
J Rural Health; 2019 Mar; 35(2):229-235. PubMed ID: 29888497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mammographic density and urbanization: a population-based screening study.
Viel JF; Rymzhanova R
J Med Screen; 2012 Mar; 19(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22337708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Volume of screening mammography and performance in the Quebec population-based Breast Cancer Screening Program.
Théberge I; Hébert-Croteau N; Langlois A; Major D; Brisson J
CMAJ; 2005 Jan; 172(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 15655240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Exploratory Study of Breast Cancer Screening Practices of Urban Women: A Closer Look at Who Is and Is Not Getting Screened.
Millon-Underwood S; Kelber ST
ABNF J; 2015; 26(2):30-8. PubMed ID: 26197633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mammography screening and breast cancer mortality in Australia: an aggregate cohort study.
Morrell S; Taylor R; Roder D; Dobson A
J Med Screen; 2012 Mar; 19(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 22345322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effectiveness of population-based service screening with mammography for women ages 40 to 49 years with a high or low risk of breast cancer: socioeconomic status, parity, and age at birth of first child.
Hellquist BN; Czene K; Hjälm A; Nyström L; Jonsson H
Cancer; 2015 Jan; 121(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 25242087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Screening mammography participation and invitational strategy: the Quebec Breast Cancer Screening Program, 1998-2000.
Jean S; Major D; Rochette L; Brisson J
Chronic Dis Can; 2005; 26(2-3):52-8. PubMed ID: 16251010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Reasons for non-participation in mammography screening--a survey in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany].
Schnoor M; Hallof A; Hergert-Lüder D; Katalinic A; Waldmann A
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2013 Nov; 138(45):2289-94. PubMed ID: 24163164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Breast cancer screening in relation to access to health services.
Facione NC
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1999 May; 26(4):689-96. PubMed ID: 10337647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Travel Burden to Breast MRI and Utilization: Are Risk and Sociodemographics Related?
Onega T; Lee CI; Benkeser D; Alford-Teaster J; Haas JS; Tosteson AN; Hill D; Shi X; Henderson LM; Hubbard RA
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Jun; 13(6):611-9. PubMed ID: 27026577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Equity regarding early breast cancer screening according to health insurance status in Colombia].
Charry LC; Carrasquilla G; Roca S
Rev Salud Publica (Bogota); 2008; 10(4):571-82. PubMed ID: 19360207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Breast cancer screening programmes: challenging the coexistence with opportunistic mammography.
Ouédraogo S; Dabakuyo-Yonli TS; Amiel P; Dancourt V; Dumas A; Arveux P
Patient Educ Couns; 2014 Dec; 97(3):410-7. PubMed ID: 25282326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Geographic access to mammography facilities and frequency of mammography screening.
Jewett PI; Gangnon RE; Elkin E; Hampton JM; Jacobs EA; Malecki K; LaGro J; Newcomb PA; Trentham-Dietz A
Ann Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):65-71.e2. PubMed ID: 29439783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Does the Neighborhood Area of Residence Influence Non-Attendance in an Urban Mammography Screening Program? A Multilevel Study in a Swedish City.
Lagerlund M; Merlo J; Vicente RP; Zackrisson S
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140244. PubMed ID: 26460609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of a programme of mass mammography screening for breast cancer on socio-economic variation in survival: a population-based study.
Louwman WJ; van de Poll-Franse LV; Fracheboud J; Roukema JA; Coebergh JW
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 105(3):369-75. PubMed ID: 17211536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does lack of resources impair access to breast and cervical cancer screening in Japan?
Sano H; Goto R; Hamashima C
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180819. PubMed ID: 28704430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Association of contextual factors and breast cancer screening: finding new targets to promote early detection.
Litaker D; Tomolo A
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2007; 16(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 17324095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Factors affecting participation in mammography screening.
McNoe B; Richardson AK; Elwood JM
N Z Med J; 1996 Sep; 109(1030):359-61. PubMed ID: 8890861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Breast cancer screening utilization and understanding of current guidelines among rural U.S. women with private insurance.
Peppercorn J; Houck K; Beri N; Villagra V; Wogu AF; Lyman GH; Wheeler SB
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 153(3):659-67. PubMed ID: 26386956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
