These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23851560)

  • 1. Adopting electronic medical records: are they just electronic paper records?
    Price M; Singer A; Kim J
    Can Fam Physician; 2013 Jul; 59(7):e322-9. PubMed ID: 23851560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adoption of electronic medical records in family practice: the providers' perspective.
    Terry AL; Giles G; Brown JB; Thind A; Stewart M
    Fam Med; 2009; 41(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 19582637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are electronic medical records helpful for care coordination? Experiences of physician practices.
    O'Malley AS; Grossman JM; Cohen GR; Kemper NM; Pham HH
    J Gen Intern Med; 2010 Mar; 25(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 20033621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beyond BMI: a feasibility study implementing NutriSTEP in primary care practices using electronic medical records (EMRs).
    Andrade L; Moran K; Snelling SJ; Malaviarachchi D; Beyers J; Near K; Randall Simpson J
    Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can; 2020 Jan; 40(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 31939632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ceiling effect in EMR system assimilation: a multiple case study in primary care family practices.
    Trudel MC; Marsan J; Paré G; Raymond L; Ortiz de Guinea A; Maillet É; Micheneau T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Apr; 17(1):46. PubMed ID: 28427405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electronic medical records and primary care quality: Evidence from Manitoba.
    Rodriguez Llorian E; Mason G
    Health Econ; 2021 May; 30(5):1124-1138. PubMed ID: 33751736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Optimization Program to Help Practices Assess Data Quality and Workflow With Their Electronic Medical Records: Observational Study.
    Jones M; Talebi R; Littlejohn J; Bosnic O; Aprile J
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2018 Dec; 5(4):e30. PubMed ID: 30578203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Data quality of electronic medical records in Manitoba: do problem lists accurately reflect chronic disease billing diagnoses?
    Singer A; Yakubovich S; Kroeker AL; Dufault B; Duarte R; Katz A
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Nov; 23(6):1107-1112. PubMed ID: 27107454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementing an electronic medical record in a family medicine practice: communication, decision making, and conflict.
    Crosson JC; Stroebel C; Scott JG; Stello B; Crabtree BF
    Ann Fam Med; 2005; 3(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 16046562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Primary health care teams' experience of electronic medical record use after adoption.
    Denomme LB; Terry AL; Brown JB; Thind A; Stewart M
    Fam Med; 2011 Oct; 43(9):638-42. PubMed ID: 22002775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards optimal electronic medical record use: perspectives of advanced users.
    Terry AL; Ryan BL; McKay S; Oates M; Strong J; McRobert K; Thind A
    Fam Pract; 2018 Sep; 35(5):607-611. PubMed ID: 29444228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors affecting the mature use of electronic medical records by primary care physicians: a systematic review.
    Rahal RM; Mercer J; Kuziemsky C; Yaya S
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Feb; 21(1):67. PubMed ID: 33607986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perspectives on electronic medical record implementation after two years of use in primary health care practice.
    Terry AL; Brown JB; Bestard Denomme L; Thind A; Stewart M
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2012; 25(4):522-7. PubMed ID: 22773720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Barriers to organizational adoption of EMR systems in family physician practices: a mixed-methods study in Canada.
    Paré G; Raymond L; de Guinea AO; Poba-Nzaou P; Trudel MC; Marsan J; Micheneau T
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Aug; 83(8):548-58. PubMed ID: 24969270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role and utilization of electronic medical records in ambulatory otolaryngology.
    Mahboubi H; Salibian AA; Wu EC; Patel MS; Armstrong WB
    Laryngoscope; 2013 Oct; 123(10):2418-22. PubMed ID: 23619936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self assessment for practices considering electronic medical record systems.
    Bever J
    J Med Pract Manage; 2007; 23(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 17974082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Environmental Impacts of Electronic Medical Records Versus Paper Records at a Large Eye Hospital in India: Life Cycle Assessment Study.
    Kwon C; Essayei L; Spencer M; Etheridge T; Venkatesh R; Vengadesan N; Thiel CL
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Feb; 26():e42140. PubMed ID: 38319701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring Factors Affecting Voluntary Adoption of Electronic Medical Records Among Physicians and Clinical Assistants of Small or Solo Private General Practice Clinics.
    Or C; Tong E; Tan J; Chan S
    J Med Syst; 2018 May; 42(7):121. PubMed ID: 29845400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Applying STOPP Guidelines in Primary Care Through Electronic Medical Record Decision Support: Randomized Control Trial Highlighting the Importance of Data Quality.
    Price M; Davies I; Rusk R; Lesperance M; Weber J
    JMIR Med Inform; 2017 Jun; 5(2):e15. PubMed ID: 28619704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of electronic medical records differs by specialty and office settings.
    Kokkonen EW; Davis SA; Lin HC; Dabade TS; Feldman SR; Fleischer AB
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2013 Jun; 20(e1):e33-8. PubMed ID: 23538721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.