BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23851560)

  • 1. Adopting electronic medical records: are they just electronic paper records?
    Price M; Singer A; Kim J
    Can Fam Physician; 2013 Jul; 59(7):e322-9. PubMed ID: 23851560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adoption of electronic medical records in family practice: the providers' perspective.
    Terry AL; Giles G; Brown JB; Thind A; Stewart M
    Fam Med; 2009; 41(7):508-12. PubMed ID: 19582637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are electronic medical records helpful for care coordination? Experiences of physician practices.
    O'Malley AS; Grossman JM; Cohen GR; Kemper NM; Pham HH
    J Gen Intern Med; 2010 Mar; 25(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 20033621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beyond BMI: a feasibility study implementing NutriSTEP in primary care practices using electronic medical records (EMRs).
    Andrade L; Moran K; Snelling SJ; Malaviarachchi D; Beyers J; Near K; Randall Simpson J
    Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can; 2020 Jan; 40(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 31939632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ceiling effect in EMR system assimilation: a multiple case study in primary care family practices.
    Trudel MC; Marsan J; Paré G; Raymond L; Ortiz de Guinea A; Maillet É; Micheneau T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Apr; 17(1):46. PubMed ID: 28427405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electronic medical records and primary care quality: Evidence from Manitoba.
    Rodriguez Llorian E; Mason G
    Health Econ; 2021 May; 30(5):1124-1138. PubMed ID: 33751736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Optimization Program to Help Practices Assess Data Quality and Workflow With Their Electronic Medical Records: Observational Study.
    Jones M; Talebi R; Littlejohn J; Bosnic O; Aprile J
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2018 Dec; 5(4):e30. PubMed ID: 30578203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Data quality of electronic medical records in Manitoba: do problem lists accurately reflect chronic disease billing diagnoses?
    Singer A; Yakubovich S; Kroeker AL; Dufault B; Duarte R; Katz A
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2016 Nov; 23(6):1107-1112. PubMed ID: 27107454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implementing an electronic medical record in a family medicine practice: communication, decision making, and conflict.
    Crosson JC; Stroebel C; Scott JG; Stello B; Crabtree BF
    Ann Fam Med; 2005; 3(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 16046562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Primary health care teams' experience of electronic medical record use after adoption.
    Denomme LB; Terry AL; Brown JB; Thind A; Stewart M
    Fam Med; 2011 Oct; 43(9):638-42. PubMed ID: 22002775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards optimal electronic medical record use: perspectives of advanced users.
    Terry AL; Ryan BL; McKay S; Oates M; Strong J; McRobert K; Thind A
    Fam Pract; 2018 Sep; 35(5):607-611. PubMed ID: 29444228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors affecting the mature use of electronic medical records by primary care physicians: a systematic review.
    Rahal RM; Mercer J; Kuziemsky C; Yaya S
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Feb; 21(1):67. PubMed ID: 33607986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perspectives on electronic medical record implementation after two years of use in primary health care practice.
    Terry AL; Brown JB; Bestard Denomme L; Thind A; Stewart M
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2012; 25(4):522-7. PubMed ID: 22773720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Barriers to organizational adoption of EMR systems in family physician practices: a mixed-methods study in Canada.
    Paré G; Raymond L; de Guinea AO; Poba-Nzaou P; Trudel MC; Marsan J; Micheneau T
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Aug; 83(8):548-58. PubMed ID: 24969270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role and utilization of electronic medical records in ambulatory otolaryngology.
    Mahboubi H; Salibian AA; Wu EC; Patel MS; Armstrong WB
    Laryngoscope; 2013 Oct; 123(10):2418-22. PubMed ID: 23619936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self assessment for practices considering electronic medical record systems.
    Bever J
    J Med Pract Manage; 2007; 23(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 17974082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Environmental Impacts of Electronic Medical Records Versus Paper Records at a Large Eye Hospital in India: Life Cycle Assessment Study.
    Kwon C; Essayei L; Spencer M; Etheridge T; Venkatesh R; Vengadesan N; Thiel CL
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Feb; 26():e42140. PubMed ID: 38319701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring Factors Affecting Voluntary Adoption of Electronic Medical Records Among Physicians and Clinical Assistants of Small or Solo Private General Practice Clinics.
    Or C; Tong E; Tan J; Chan S
    J Med Syst; 2018 May; 42(7):121. PubMed ID: 29845400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Applying STOPP Guidelines in Primary Care Through Electronic Medical Record Decision Support: Randomized Control Trial Highlighting the Importance of Data Quality.
    Price M; Davies I; Rusk R; Lesperance M; Weber J
    JMIR Med Inform; 2017 Jun; 5(2):e15. PubMed ID: 28619704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of electronic medical records differs by specialty and office settings.
    Kokkonen EW; Davis SA; Lin HC; Dabade TS; Feldman SR; Fleischer AB
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2013 Jun; 20(e1):e33-8. PubMed ID: 23538721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.