125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2385192)
1. Maximizing film contrast for scanning equalization radiography.
Plewes DB; McFaul J; Ivanovic M
Med Phys; 1990; 17(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 2385192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Scanning equalization radiography of the chest: assessment of image quality.
Wandtke JC; Plewes DP; Vogelstein E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Nov; 145(5):973-8. PubMed ID: 2931967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Physics homogenization and the choice of screen-film combination in conventional thoracic radiography].
Roversi R; Castaldini L; Guidarelli G
Radiol Med; 1993 Dec; 86(6):885-92. PubMed ID: 8296012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of chest films of equalization radiography (advanced multiple beam equalization radiography). Comparison by means of a receiver operating characteristic study of simulated nodular interstitial disease.
Schultz Kool LJ; van Proosdij M; van Metter R; Vrooman HA; Aarts NJ; Shaw PM; Obermann WR; Heijboer RJ; Memel DS; Oestmann JW
Invest Radiol; 1994 Dec; 29(12):1020-5. PubMed ID: 7721542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. AMBER: a scanning multiple-beam equalization system for chest radiography.
Vlasbloem H; Kool LJ
Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 3420279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved chest disease detection with scanning equalization radiography.
Wandtke JC; Plewes DB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Nov; 145(5):979-83. PubMed ID: 3876756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Radiography of the thorax with phospholuminescent screens].
Frija J; Zagdanski AM; De Kerviler E; Attal P; Laval-Jeantet M
Ann Radiol (Paris); 1994; 37(3):157-68. PubMed ID: 8092748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Experimental and clinical studies on utility of advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary mass lesions].
Itouji E; Kono M
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Nov; 54(13):1252-62. PubMed ID: 7610028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of an asymmetric screen-film system for chest radiography.
Morishita J; MacMahon H; Doi K; Carlin M; Sukenobu Y
Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1769-75. PubMed ID: 7891639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of resolution and sensitometric characteristics of an asymmetric screen-film imaging system.
Gray JE; Stears JG; Swensen SJ; Bunch PC
Radiology; 1993 Aug; 188(2):537-9. PubMed ID: 8327711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Clinical evaluation of asymmetric film-screen system for thoracic lesions].
Shimizu T; Yamamoto K; Ogura Y; Aratake K; Nakata Y; Saika Y; Sagami A; Ashina K; Sueyoshi K; Narabayashi I
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 May; 54(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 8028952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of an asymmetric screen-film combination with a conventional screen-film combination for chest radiography in 51 patients.
Greaney T; McCoy C; Masterson J
Br J Radiol; 1997 Sep; 70(837):929-32. PubMed ID: 9486069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technique charts for Kodak EC-L film screen system for portal localization in a 6MV X-ray beam.
Sandilos P; Antypas C; Paraskevopoulou C; Kouvaris J; Vlachos L
Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(6):467-72. PubMed ID: 17148858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
