125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2385192)
21. Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study.
Beute GH; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR; Samei E; Spizarny DL; Zylak CJ
Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 9599395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of scanning equalization and conventional chest radiography.
Wandtke JC; Plewes DB
Radiology; 1989 Sep; 172(3):641-5. PubMed ID: 2772170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [High intensification film-screen systems in thoracic diagnosis. A clinical comparative study].
Schäfer CB; Sokiranski R; Claussen CD
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 8580141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.
Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15933120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Exposure equalization radiography of the chest: clinical comparison of slit and raster scanning techniques.
Wandtke JC; Plewes DB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Jun; 144(6):1171-81. PubMed ID: 3873796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Experiences with digital luminescence radiography (DLR) in pediatric radiology].
Vosshenrich R; Weigel W; Fischer U; Funke M; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1992 Feb; 156(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 1739766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Can digital luminescent radiography substitute for conventional x-ray technics in chest radiography?].
Neufang KF; Krug B; Lorenz R; Steinbrich W
Rofo; 1990 May; 152(5):501-9. PubMed ID: 2160680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems.
Sanada S; Doi K; Xu XW; Yin FF; Giger ML; MacMahon H
Med Phys; 1991; 18(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 1870484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Detection of simulated chest lesions: comparison of a conventional screen-film combination, an asymmetric screen-film system, and storage phosphor radiography.
Leppert AG; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Galanski M
Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):259-63. PubMed ID: 7892482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Basic imaging properties of a new screen-film system for chest radiography.
Higashida Y; Murakami Y; Yoshida A; Kastuda N; Moribe N; Bussaka H; Hamada T; Yoshida Y; Hidetoshi M; Takahashi M
Med Phys; 1996 Aug; 23(8):1351-7. PubMed ID: 8873032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Preliminary clinical applications of asymmetric screen-film systems in chest radiography].
Higashida Y; Katsuda N; Tochihara S; Yoshioka S; Bussaka H; Tomiguchi S; Takada T; Matsumoto M; Takahashi M; Yoshida A
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Feb; 54(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 8121782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.
Dobbins JT; Rice JJ; Beam CA; Ravin CE
Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 1549669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Rotary scanning equalization radiography: an efficient geometry for equalization mammography.
Sabol JM; Tam KK; Plewes DB
Med Phys; 1994 Oct; 21(10):1523-33. PubMed ID: 7869983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Advanced multiple beam equalization radiography: receiver operating characteristic comparison with screen-film chest radiography.
Swensen SJ; Aughenbaugh GL; Brown LR; Harms GF; Karsell PR; Gray JE; Ilstrup DM; Hodge DO
Mayo Clin Proc; 1998 Jul; 73(7):636-41. PubMed ID: 9663191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Study of X-ray filter and peak kilovoltage in film-screen chest radiographs in regard to detection of simulated pulmonary nodules: comparison between film-screen combination and FCR].
Kiyono K; Sone S; Sakai F; Kawai T; Karakida O; Kasuga T; Hirano H; Matsumoto T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Nov; 54(13):1237-44. PubMed ID: 7610026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
