935 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23852226)
1. Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study.
Paul S; Padmanabhan TV; Swarup S
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23852226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress in Tapered and Cylindrical Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
Rasouli-Ghahroudi AA; Geramy A; Yaghobee S; Khorsand A; Yousefifakhr H; Rokn A; Soolari A
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 17(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26233968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of the implant design on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis of original computer-aided design models.
Yamanishi Y; Yamaguchi S; Imazato S; Nakano T; Yatani H
J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):e333-8. PubMed ID: 24835549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Chang CL; Chen CS; Hsu ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20369087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of platform switching on stress distribution in implants and periimplant bone studied by nonlinear finite element analysis.
Liu S; Tang C; Yu J; Dai W; Bao Y; Hu D
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1111-8. PubMed ID: 24882594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Straight and angulated abutments in platform switching: influence of loading on bone stress by three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Martini AP; Freitas AC; Rocha EP; de Almeida EO; Anchieta RB; Kina S; Fasolo GB
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 23(2):415-8. PubMed ID: 22421854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of tapered and external hexagon connections on bone stresses around tilted dental implants: three-dimensional finite element method with statistical analysis.
de Faria Almeida DA; Pellizzer EP; Verri FR; Santiago JF; de Carvalho PS
J Periodontol; 2014 Feb; 85(2):261-9. PubMed ID: 23688104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: a finite element study.
Saab XE; Griggs JA; Powers JM; Engelmeier RL
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Feb; 97(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 17341376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Regular and switching platform: bone stress analysis with varying implant diameter.
Vargas LC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Kina S; Anchieta RB; Júnior AC; França FM
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Jun; 39(3):326-31. PubMed ID: 21231868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of placement depth of platform-switched implants on periimplant cortical bone stress: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Rismanchian M; Askari N; Shafiei S
Implant Dent; 2013 Apr; 22(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 23416848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of platform and abutment angulation on peri-implant bone. A three-dimensional finite element stress analysis.
Martini AP; Barros RM; Júnior AC; Rocha EP; de Almeida EO; Ferraz CC; Pellegrin MC; Anchieta RB
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Dec; 39(6):663-9. PubMed ID: 23110305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching: different mismatch sizes, connection types, and implant protocols.
Pessoa RS; Bezerra FJ; Sousa RM; Vander Sloten J; Casati MZ; Jaecques SV
J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):1161-71. PubMed ID: 24635544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis.
Schrotenboer J; Tsao YP; Kinariwala V; Wang HL
Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19509536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone-implant interface with simulated insertion stress around an immediately loaded dental implant in the anterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Lee JS; Cho IH; Kim YS; Heo SJ; Kwon HB; Lim YJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 22442767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
