935 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23852226)
21. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Stress distribution on scalloped implants with different microthread and connection configurations using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Choi KS; Park SH; Lee JH; Jeon YC; Yun MJ; Jeong CM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):e29-38. PubMed ID: 22616069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Pessoa RS; Vaz LG; Marcantonio E; Vander Sloten J; Duyck J; Jaecques SV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):911-9. PubMed ID: 20862404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A three-dimensional finite element analysis for overdenture attachments supported by teeth and/or mini dental implants.
Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):604-13. PubMed ID: 22845394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of the rigidity of a provisional restoration supported on four immediately loaded implants in the edentulous maxilla on biomechanical bone-implant interactions under simulated bruxism conditions: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Yamaguchi K; Ishiura Y; Tanaka S; Baba K
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):442-50. PubMed ID: 25191887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis.
Atieh MA; Shahmiri RA
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 21905902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical investigations of the expanded platform-switching concept in immediately loaded small diameter implants.
Wu AY; Lung H; Huang HL; Chee W
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jan; 115(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 26421604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Analyzing the effects of the platform-switching procedure on stresses in the bone and implant-abutment complex by 3-dimensional fem analysis.
Cimen H; Yengin E
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Feb; 38(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 20662671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments: preliminary data from a prospective study.
Hürzeler M; Fickl S; Zuhr O; Wachtel HC
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 65(7 Suppl 1):33-9. PubMed ID: 17586347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bone response from a dynamic stimulus on a one-piece and multi-piece implant abutment and crown by finite element analysis.
Hajimiragha H; Abolbashari M; Nokar S; Abolbashari A; Abolbashari M
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Oct; 40(5):525-32. PubMed ID: 23317175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of microthreads and platform switching on crestal bone stress levels: a finite element analysis.
Schrotenboer J; Tsao YP; Kinariwala V; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):2166-72. PubMed ID: 18980526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. 3D finite element analysis of changes in stress levels and distributions for an osseointegrated implant after vertical bone loss.
Yoon KH; Kim SG; Lee JH; Suh SW
Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 21811169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bone strain and interfacial sliding analyses of platform switching and implant diameter on an immediately loaded implant: experimental and three-dimensional finite element analyses.
Hsu JT; Fuh LJ; Lin DJ; Shen YW; Huang HL
J Periodontol; 2009 Jul; 80(7):1125-32. PubMed ID: 19563293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical aspects of bone-level diameter shifting at implant-abutment interface.
Canay S; Akça K
Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 19509534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis.
Kao HC; Gung YW; Chung TF; Hsu ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The biomechanical analysis of relative position between implant and alveolar bone: finite element method.
Huang CC; Lan TH; Lee HE; Wang CH
J Periodontol; 2011 Mar; 82(3):489-96. PubMed ID: 20936917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of fine threads and platform-switching on crestal bone stress around implant-a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Khurana P; Sharma A; Sodhi KK
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Dec; 39(6):697-703. PubMed ID: 21905886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
