These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23852232)
1. Precision of dimensional measurements of mandible in different positions on orthopantomogram. Arora H; Jain V; Pai KM; Kamboj R Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 23852232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the precision of dimensional measurements of the mandible on panoramic radiographs. Catić A; Celebić A; Valentić-Peruzović M; Catović A; Jerolimov V; Muretić I Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Aug; 86(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 9720102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Linear mandibular measurements: comparison between orthopantomograms and lateral cephalograms. Ongkosuwito EM; Dieleman MM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Mulder PG; van Neck JW Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2009 Mar; 46(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 19254052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dimensional accuracy and details of the panoramic cross-sectional tomographic images: an in vitro study. Kumar MA; Mody B; Nair GK; Surender LR; Gopal SS; Prasad RV J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 22430700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy of panoramic cross-sectional tomography, its ability to identify the inferior alveolar canal, and its impact on estimation of appropriate implant dimensions in the mandibular posterior region. Mehra A; Pai KM Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 19673959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects. Vazquez L; Nizamaldin Y; Combescure C; Nedir R; Bischof M; Dohan Ehrenfest DM; Carrel JP; Belser UC Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(2):20110429. PubMed ID: 23360688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Precision and accuracy of measurements in digital panoramic radiography. Schulze R; Krummenauer F; Schalldach F; d'Hoedt B Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 10654037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dimensional measurements on the human dental panoramic radiographs. Catić A; Celebić A; Valentić-Peruzović M; Catović A; Kuna T Coll Antropol; 1998 Dec; 22 Suppl():139-45. PubMed ID: 9951155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone height measurements on panoramic radiographs: the effect of shape and position of edentulous mandibles. Batenburg RH; Stellingsma K; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Oct; 84(4):430-5. PubMed ID: 9347510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The orthopantomogram, an aid in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint problems. I. The factor of vertical magnification. Habets LL; Bezuur JN; van Ooij CP; Hansson TL J Oral Rehabil; 1987 Sep; 14(5):475-80. PubMed ID: 3478455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of linear measurements before and after digitizing periapical and panoramic radiography images. Langlois Cde O; Sampaio MC; Silva AE; Costa NP; Rockenbach MI Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22011897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of changes in head position on enlargement of structures during panoramic radiography. Pfeiffer P; Bewersdorf S; Schmage P Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 22299079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of horizontal magnification on panoramic images. Raoof M; Haghani J; Ebrahimi M Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 24025873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy and prediction of asymmetry in panoramic radiographic images. Laster WS; Ludlow JB; Bailey LJ; Hershey HG Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Nov; 34(6):343-9. PubMed ID: 16227476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of reliability and reproducibility of linear measurements of cone-beam-computed tomography. Santos Tde S; Gomes AC; de Melo DG; Melo AR; Cavalcante JR; de Araújo LC; Travassos RM; Martins-Filho PR; Piva MR; Silva HF Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 23257480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using cone beam computed tomography to determine safe regions for implant placement. Sokhn S; Nasseh I; Noujeim M Gen Dent; 2011; 59(2):e72-7. PubMed ID: 21903512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Effect of positioning errors on magnification factors in the mandible in digital panorama imaging]. Schulze R; Schalldach F; d'Hoedt B Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 May; 4(3):164-70. PubMed ID: 10900960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones in panoramic radiographs of dentate and edentulous subjects. Sağlam AA Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):433-8. PubMed ID: 12073724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of the vertical magnification factor on panoramic radiographs: clinical implications for posterior mandibular implants. Vazquez L; Nizam Al Din Y; Christoph Belser U; Combescure C; Bernard JP Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Dec; 22(12):1420-5. PubMed ID: 21435009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of bone width lateral to the mandibular canal as an alternative approach for implant installation. Daróz SR; Cardoso ES; Manso MC; Vidigal GM Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23303270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]