408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23852255)
1. Microleakage evaluation of Silorane-based composite and methacrylate-based composite in class II box preparations using two different layering techniques: an in vitro study.
Joseph A; Santhosh L; Hegde J; Panchajanya S; George R
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):148. PubMed ID: 23852255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of silorane-based composite and nanohybrid composite with or without polyethylene fiber inserts in class II restorations: an in vitro study.
Agrawal VS; Parekh VV; Shah NC
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):E1-7. PubMed ID: 22616928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Restoration interface microleakage using one total-etch and three self-etch adhesives.
Deliperi S; Bardwell DN; Wegley C
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 17427828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of delayed light polymerization of a dual-cured composite base on marginal adaptation of class II posterior composite open-sandwich restoration.
Kamath U; Sheth H;
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):296. PubMed ID: 22945734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations.
Krifka S; Federlin M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1117-24. PubMed ID: 21947906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture resistance of premolar teeth restored with silorane-based or dimethacrylate-based composite resins.
Akbarian G; Ameri H; Chasteen JE; Ghavamnasiri M
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2014; 26(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 24103086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of different monomer-based composites and acid etching pre-treatment of enamel on the microleakage using self-etch adhesives systems.
Catelan A; Giorgi MC; Soares GP; Lima DA; Marchi GM; Aguiar FH
Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Nov; 72(8):651-5. PubMed ID: 24580091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of flowable materials on the microleakage of Class II composite restorations that extend apical to the cemento-enamel junction.
Sadeghi M; Lynch CD
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 19544820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of different polymerization methods on composite microleakage.
Deliperi S; Bardwell DN; Papathanasiou A
Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():73A-76A. PubMed ID: 14674504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of delayed placement of composite and double application of single-bottle adhesives on microleakage of composite restorations.
Shafiei F; Kiomarsi N; Alavi AA
Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):40-5; quiz 46-7, 80. PubMed ID: 21613038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of oxalate desensitizers on the microleakage of resin composite restorations bonded by etch and rinse adhesive systems.
Shafiei F; Motamedi M; Alavi AA; Namvar B
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):682-8. PubMed ID: 21180008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations.
Olmez A; Oztas N; Bodur H
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):713-9. PubMed ID: 15646229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations.
Amaral CM; Hara AT; Pimenta LA; Rodrigues AL
Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 11806477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage in class II restorations: open vs closed centripetal build-up technique.
Fabianelli A; Sgarra A; Goracci C; Cantoro A; Pollington S; Ferrari M
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 20533631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
