143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2385384)
1. Peer review in performance appraisal.
Mann LM; Barton CF; Presti MT; Hirsch JE
Nurs Adm Q; 1990; 14(4):9-14. PubMed ID: 2385384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review--why and how to do it.
Jackson SA
Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):60-86. PubMed ID: 2640603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating clinical competency in nursing.
Lunde KF; Durbin-Lafferty E
Nurs Manage; 1986 Aug; 17(8):47-50. PubMed ID: 3637728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [The evaluation-notation].
Mizrahi MR
Soins Gynecol Obstet Pueric Pediatr; 1990; (109-110):30-6. PubMed ID: 2389233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Setting standards and evaluating nursing performance with a single tool.
Fosbinder D; Vos H
J Nurs Adm; 1989 Oct; 19(10):23-30. PubMed ID: 2778515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Choosing a performance appraisal system.
Grose LG
Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):38-46. PubMed ID: 2640601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. How evaluations can improve performance.
DeSimone A
RN; 1984 Jul; 47(7):15, 17. PubMed ID: 6564689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The clinical nurse specialist: evaluation issues.
Morath JM
Nurs Manage; 1988 Mar; 19(3):72-5, 78, 80. PubMed ID: 3347408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Criteria-based performance appraisals.
Lerch EM
Nurs Manage; 1982 Jul; 13(7):28-30. PubMed ID: 6920625
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance appraisal tests for staff nurses.
Cunningham CV
Nurs Times; 1981 May; 77(22):suppl 16: 61-3. PubMed ID: 6909815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Making peer review work in the emergency setting: the Johns Hopkins Hospital experience.
Hoelz JJ; Pieterick CL
Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 2640605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Being objective about appraisal.
McKenzie I
Nurs Times; 1985 Dec 18-31; 81(51):25-6. PubMed ID: 3853781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance management.
Pulce R
Semin Nurse Manag; 2002 Jun; 10(2):83. PubMed ID: 12180401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement technology applications in performance appraisal.
Stalker MZ; Kornblith AB; Lewis PM; Parker R
J Nurs Adm; 1986 Apr; 16(4):12-7. PubMed ID: 3633963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating float staff.
Bower KA
Nurs Manage; 1987 Dec; 18(12):62-3. PubMed ID: 3696621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Toward a comprehensive personnel system: staff development Part III.
Nauright LP
Nurs Manage; 1987 Jul; 18(7):44-6, 48. PubMed ID: 3648598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Peer review.
Micheli AJ; Modest S
Nurs Clin North Am; 1995 Jun; 30(2):197-210. PubMed ID: 7777403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nursing education/service. Contracting for growth.
Aroian J; Grant KJ; Gilbert JP
Am J Nurs; 1984 Aug; 84(8):1042, 1044. PubMed ID: 6565461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Peer evaluation - a model concept].
Gratias R
Krankenpflege (Frankf); 1983 Jun; 37(6):212-4. PubMed ID: 6411977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance evaluation of staff nurses.
Goodykoontz L
Superv Nurse; 1981 Aug; 12(8):39-43. PubMed ID: 6910946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
