BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23855170)

  • 1. A two-year clinical evaluation of glass ionomer and ormocer based fissure sealants.
    Guler C; Yilmaz Y
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013; 37(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 23855170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Twenty-four month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant.
    Antonson SA; Antonson DE; Brener S; Crutchfield J; Larumbe J; Michaud C; Yazici AR; Hardigan PC; Alempour S; Evans D; Ocanto R
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Feb; 143(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 22298552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The success rates of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant placed by fifth-year undergraduate dental students.
    Ulusu T; Odabaş ME; Tüzüner T; Baygin O; Sillelioğlu H; Deveci C; Gökdoğan FG; Altuntaş A
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2012 Apr; 13(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 22449810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retention of a resin-based sealant and a glass ionomer used as a fissure sealant: a comparative clinical study.
    Subramaniam P; Konde S; Mandanna DK
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2008 Sep; 26(3):114-20. PubMed ID: 18923223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention of fissure sealants in young permanent molars affected by dental fluorosis: a 12-month clinical study.
    Hasanuddin S; Reddy ER; Manjula M; Srilaxmi N; Rani ST; Rajesh A
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2014 Oct; 15(5):309-15. PubMed ID: 24737141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Heat-treated glass ionomer cement fissure sealants: retention after 1 year follow-up.
    Skrinjaric K; Vranic DN; Glavina D; Skrinjaric I
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep; 18(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 18298543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of marginal integrity of glass ionomer and resin based fissure sealants using invasive and non-invasive techniques: an in vitro study.
    Gunjal S; Nagesh L; Raju HG
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 23059566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fuji III vs. Fuji VII glass ionomer sealants--a clinical study.
    Kamala BK; Hegde AM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2008; 33(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 19093648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of glass-ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a 2-year clinical trial.
    Forss H; Saarni UM; Seppä L
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1994 Feb; 22(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 8143437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Caries-Preventive Effect and Retention of Glass-Ionomer and Resin-Based Sealants: A Randomized Clinical Comparative Evaluation.
    Uzel I; Gurlek C; Kuter B; Ertugrul F; Eden E
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():7205692. PubMed ID: 35769675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of FUJI VII sealant material.
    Ganesh M; Tandon S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 31(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 17091660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retention rates and caries-preventive effects of two different sealant materials: a randomised clinical trial.
    Cabral RN; Faber J; Otero SAM; Hilgert LA; Leal SC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec; 22(9):3171-3177. PubMed ID: 29524027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical comparison of Fuji VII and a resin sealant in children at high and low risk of caries.
    Chen Xx; Liu Xg
    Dent Mater J; 2013; 32(3):512-8. PubMed ID: 23719016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retention and caries-preventive effect of glass ionomer and resin-based sealants: An 18-month-randomized clinical trial.
    Al-Jobair A; Al-Hammad N; Alsadhan S; Salama F
    Dent Mater J; 2017 Sep; 36(5):654-661. PubMed ID: 28701637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage, adaptation ability and clinical efficacy of two fluoride releasing fissure sealants.
    Marković D; Petrović B; Perić T; Blagojević D
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2012 Apr; 69(4):320-5. PubMed ID: 22624423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survival Analysis of Glass Ionomer Cement and Resin-Based Sealant Retention: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study.
    Petrauskienė S; Saldūnaitė-Mikučionienė K; Narbutaitė J
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 May; 60(5):. PubMed ID: 38792939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A two-year evaluation of four different fissure sealants.
    Yilmaz Y; Beldüz N; Eyüboglu O
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2010 Apr; 11(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 20403303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer for pit and fissure sealing of fully erupted molars.
    Sly EG; Kaplan AE; Missana L
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2010; 23(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 20645635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A field trial of resin-based and glass-ionomer fissure sealants: clinical and radiographic assessment of caries.
    Poulsen S; Laurberg L; Vaeth M; Jensen U; Haubek D
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2006 Feb; 34(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 16423029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Glass-ionomer fissure sealants: Clinical observations up to 13 years.
    Markovic D; Peric T; Petrovic B
    J Dent; 2018 Dec; 79():85-89. PubMed ID: 30352257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.