BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23855171)

  • 1. Chemomechanical caries removal in primary molars : evaluation of marginal leakage and shear bond strength in bonded restorations--an in vitro study.
    Viral PM; Nagarathna C; Shakuntala BS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2013; 37(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 23855171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of chemomechanical caries removal on bonding of self-etching adhesives to caries-affected dentin.
    Hamama HH; Yiu CK; Burrow MF
    J Adhes Dent; 2014 Dec; 16(6):507-16. PubMed ID: 25516887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Permeability evaluation after decay removal in primary teeth with current caries-excavation techniques.
    Shabzendedar M; Moosavi H; Talbi M; Sharifi M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Nov; 12(6):441-6. PubMed ID: 22269234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study of the clinical efficiency of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv and Papacarie - a papain gel.
    Kumar J; Nayak M; Prasad KL; Gupta N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):697. PubMed ID: 23422631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro evaluation of marginal leakage in bonded restorations, with mechanical or chemical-mechanical (Carisolv) removal of carious tissue.
    Okida RC; Martins TM; Briso AL
    Braz Oral Res; 2007; 21(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 17589655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of Carisolv in the chemico-mechanical removal of carious dentin.
    Munshi AK; Hegde AM; Shetty PK
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 26(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 11688813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nanoleakage of dentin adhesive systems bonded to Carisolv-treated dentin.
    Kubo S; Li H; Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):387-95. PubMed ID: 12120777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chemical, morphological and microhardness changes of dentine after chemomechanical caries removal.
    Hamama HH; Yiu CK; Burrow MF; King NM
    Aust Dent J; 2013 Sep; 58(3):283-92. PubMed ID: 23981208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in vitro evaluation of microtensile bond strengths of two adhesive bonding agents to residual dentine after caries removal using three excavation techniques.
    Banerjee A; Kellow S; Mannocci F; Cook RJ; Watson TF
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):480-9. PubMed ID: 20223273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Caries removal with Carisolv system: criteria evaluation and microleakage test.
    Yamada Y; Kimura Y; Hossain M; Kinoshita JI; Shimizu Y; Matsumoto K
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2005; 30(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 16491965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of residual dentin after conventional and chemomechanical caries removal using SEM.
    Corrêa FN; Rodrigues Filho LE; Rodrigues CR
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2008; 32(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 18389676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
    Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strength of caries-affected human dentine after three different caries removal techniques.
    Sirin Karaarslan E; Yildiz E; Cebe MA; Yegin Z; Ozturk B
    J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):793-801. PubMed ID: 22687577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv or conventional hand excavation in deciduous teeth in vitro.
    Flückiger L; Waltimo T; Stich H; Lussi A
    J Dent; 2005 Feb; 33(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 15683888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bonding of resin composite to caries-affected dentin after Carisolv(®) treatment.
    Zawaideh F; Palamara JE; Messer LB
    Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 21703073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of caries removal techniques on the bond strength of adhesives to caries-affected primary dentin in vitro.
    Yildiz E; Sirinkaraarslan E; Yegin Z; Cebe MA; Tosun G
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 24295006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical randomized controlled trial of chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv).
    Lozano-Chourio MA; Zambrano O; González H; Quero M
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2006 May; 16(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 16643536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bonding of single-component adhesives to dentin following chemomechanical caries removal.
    El-Kholany NR; Abdelaziz KM; Zaghloul NM; Aboulenien N
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):281-7. PubMed ID: 16430008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal leakage in direct and indirect composite resin restorations in primary teeth: an in vitro study.
    Ferreira MC; Vieira RS
    J Dent; 2008 May; 36(5):322-5. PubMed ID: 18336986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chemical versus conventional caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a microhardness study.
    Corrêa FN; Rocha Rde O; Rodrigues Filho LE; Muench A; Rodrigues CR
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2007; 31(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 17550045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.