These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23855171)
41. A comparative clinical study of various methods of caries removal in children. Soni HK; Sharma A; Sood PB Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2015 Feb; 16(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 25391222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. An evaluation of different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a comparitive clinical study. Kochhar GK; Srivastava N; Pandit IK; Gugnani N; Gupta M J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2011; 36(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 22900437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. A morphological and micro-tensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected human dentine after four different caries removal techniques. Cehreli ZC; Yazici AR; Akca T; Ozgünaltay G J Dent; 2003 Aug; 31(6):429-35. PubMed ID: 12878026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Clinical evaluation of caries removal in primary teeth using conventional, chemomechanical and laser technique: an in vivo study. Bohari MR; Chunawalla YK; Ahmed BM J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 22430692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Efficacy and tolerance of papain gel with conventional drilling method: a clinico-microbiological study. Goyal PA; Kumari R; Kannan VP; Madhu S J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 25823480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. X-ray microtomography assessment of Carisolv and Papacarie effect on dentin mineral density and amount of removed tissue. AlHumaid J; Al-Harbi F; El Tantawi M; Elembaby A Acta Odontol Scand; 2018 May; 76(4):236-240. PubMed ID: 29161950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Mineral content removal after Papacarie application in primary teeth: a quantitative analysis. Bittencourt ST; Pereira JR; Rosa AW; Oliveira KS; Ghizoni JS; Oliveira MT J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 34(3):229-31. PubMed ID: 20578660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Various methods of caries removal in children: a comparative clinical study. Pandit IK; Srivastava N; Gugnani N; Gupta M; Verma L J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2007; 25(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 17660645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effect of chemomechanical caries removal on bonding of resin-modified glass ionomer cement adhesives to caries-affected dentine. Hamama H; Yiu C; Burrow MF Aust Dent J; 2015 Jun; 60(2):190-9. PubMed ID: 25989193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A chemomechanical method for caries removal. Morrow LA; Hassall DC; Watts DC; Wilson NH Dent Update; 2000 Oct; 27(8):398-401. PubMed ID: 11218535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Efficacy of chemo-mechanical caries removal with Carisolv. Hosein T; Hasan A J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Apr; 18(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 18474155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Residual caries and marginal integrity in relation to Class II glass ionomer restorations in primary molars. Mhaville RJ; van Amerongen WE; Mandari GJ Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2006 Jun; 7(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 17140532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Microleakage of compomer restorations in primary teeth after preparation with bur or air abrasion. Aysegül O; Nurhan O; Haluk B; Dilek T Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15853100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of Carisolv system vs traditional rotating instruments for caries removal in the primary dentition: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lai G; Lara Capi C; Cocco F; Cagetti MG; Lingström P; Almhöjd U; Campus G Acta Odontol Scand; 2015; 73(8):569-80. PubMed ID: 25772193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Strategies for addressing restorative challenges in HIV-infected children. Abdelnur JP; Cerqueira DF; Castro GF; Maia LC; de Souza IP J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 18505652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Clinical evaluation of the Carisolv chemomechanical caries removal technique according to the site/stage concept, a revised caries classification system. Chaussain-Miller C; Decup F; Domejean-Orliaguet S; Gillet D; Guigand M; Kaleka R; Laboux O; Lafont J; Medioni E; Serfaty R; Toumelin-Chemla F; Tubiana J; Lasfargues JJ Clin Oral Investig; 2003 Mar; 7(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12673435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Analysis of surface roughness and microleakage of fissure sealants following organic debris removal with Carisolv. Yamada Y; Hossain M; Shimizu Y; Kimura Y; Masuda Y; Nakamura Y; Matsumoto K J Dent; 2008 Feb; 36(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 18179855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Awareness of dental surgeons in Pune and Mumbai, India, regarding chemomechanical caries removal system. Bijle MN; Patil S; Mumkekar SS; Arora N; Bhalla M; Murali KV J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 23579902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]