These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23855459)

  • 1. Renewal effects in interference between outcomes as measured by a cued response reaction time task: further evidence for associative retrieval models.
    Cobos PL; González-Martín E; Varona-Moya S; López FJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Oct; 39(4):299-310. PubMed ID: 23855459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interference between outcomes, spontaneous recovery, and context effects as measured by a cued response reaction time task: evidence for associative retrieval models.
    González-Martín E; Cobos PL; Morís J; López FJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Oct; 38(4):419-32. PubMed ID: 22905829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Memory as discrimination: a challenge to the encoding-retrieval match principle.
    Poirier M; Nairne JS; Morin C; Zimmermann FG; Koutmeridou K; Fowler J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):16-29. PubMed ID: 21823814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contextual cues aid recovery from interruption: the role of associative activation.
    Hodgetts HM; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1120-32. PubMed ID: 16938050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Associative repetition priming as a measure of human contingency learning: evidence of forward and backward blocking.
    Morís J; Cobos PL; Luque D; López FJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Feb; 143(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 23230993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dissociations between expectancy and performance in simple and two-choice reaction-time tasks: A test of associative and nonassociative explanations.
    Barrett LC; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):864-77. PubMed ID: 20565206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Asymmetries in cue competition in forward and backward blocking designs: Further evidence for causal model theory.
    Booth SL; Buehner MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Mar; 60(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 17366307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Associative status of the training context determines the effectiveness of compound extinction.
    Witnauer JE; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jan; 38(1):52-65. PubMed ID: 22229586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrative and semantic relations equally alleviate age-related associative memory deficits.
    Badham SP; Estes Z; Maylor EA
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Mar; 27(1):141-52. PubMed ID: 21639644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcome value influences attentional biases in human associative learning: dissociable effects of training and instruction.
    Le Pelley ME; Mitchell CJ; Johnson AM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Jan; 39(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 23316975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reaction time as a measure of human associative learning.
    Craddock P; Molet M; Miller RR
    Behav Processes; 2012 Jun; 90(2):189-97. PubMed ID: 22301095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is performance in task-cuing experiments mediated by task set selection or associative compound retrieval?
    Forrest CL; Monsell S; McLaren IP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1002-24. PubMed ID: 24564543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Heightened conflict in cue-target translation increases backward inhibition in set switching.
    Grange JA; Houghton G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1003-9. PubMed ID: 20565215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Curved saccade trajectories reveal conflicting predictions in associative learning.
    Koenig S; Lachnit H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1164-77. PubMed ID: 21707209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrieval-induced forgetting and interference between cues: training a cue-outcome association attenuates retrieval by alternative cues.
    Ortega-Castro N; Vadillo MA
    Behav Processes; 2013 Mar; 94():19-25. PubMed ID: 23201373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of outcome inhibition in interference between outcomes: a contingency-learning analogue of retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Vadillo MA; Orgaz C; Luque D; Cobos PL; López FJ; Matute H
    Br J Psychol; 2013 May; 104(2):167-80. PubMed ID: 23560664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
    Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The list-strength effect in recall: relative-strength competition and retrieval inhibition may both contribute to forgetting.
    Verde MF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):205-20. PubMed ID: 19210091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.
    de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing and feedback effects on front-end control over later retrieval.
    Thomas RC; McDaniel MA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):437-50. PubMed ID: 22732026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.