These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23855496)

  • 1. P-curve: a key to the file-drawer.
    Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Apr; 143(2):534-47. PubMed ID: 23855496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Some properties of p-curves, with an application to gradual publication bias.
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Sep; 23(3):546-560. PubMed ID: 28425729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Significance bias: an empirical evaluation of the oral health literature.
    Kagereki E; Gakonyo J; Simila H
    BMC Oral Health; 2016 May; 16(1):53. PubMed ID: 27150796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. P-Curve Analysis of the Köhler Motivation Gain Effect in Exercise Settings: A Demonstration of a Novel Technique to Estimate Evidential Value Across Multiple Studies.
    Hill CR; Samendinger S; Rymal AM
    Ann Behav Med; 2021 Jun; 55(6):543-556. PubMed ID: 33031538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Better P-curves: Making P-curve analysis more robust to errors, fraud, and ambitious P-hacking, a Reply to Ulrich and Miller (2015).
    Simonsohn U; Simmons JP; Nelson LD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Dec; 144(6):1146-52. PubMed ID: 26595842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. p-Curve and Effect Size: Correcting for Publication Bias Using Only Significant Results.
    Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2014 Nov; 9(6):666-81. PubMed ID: 26186117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Problems in using p-curve analysis and text-mining to detect rate of p-hacking and evidential value.
    Bishop DV; Thompson PA
    PeerJ; 2016; 4():e1715. PubMed ID: 26925335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence that nonsignificant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting?
    Chuard PJC; Vrtílek M; Head ML; Jennions MD
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Jan; 17(1):e3000127. PubMed ID: 30682013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating the extent of selective reporting: An application to economics.
    Bruns SB; Deressa TK; Stanley TD; Doucouliagos C; Ioannidis JPA
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 Jul; 15(4):590-602. PubMed ID: 38379427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Meta-analyses and P-curves support robust cycle shifts in women's mate preferences: Reply to Wood and Carden (2014) and Harris, Pashler, and Mickes (2014)": Correction to Gildersleeve, Haselton, and Fales (2014).
    Psychol Bull; 2017 Nov; 143(11):iii. PubMed ID: 29048180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. fiddle: a tool to combat publication bias by getting research out of the file drawer and into the scientific community.
    Bernard R; Weissgerber TL; Bobrov E; Winham SJ; Dirnagl U; Riedel N
    Clin Sci (Lond); 2020 Oct; 134(20):2729-2739. PubMed ID: 33111948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Search for Significance: A Few Peculiarities in the Distribution of P Values in Experimental Psychology Literature.
    Krawczyk M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0127872. PubMed ID: 26061881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 99% impossible: A valid, or falsifiable, internal meta-analysis.
    Vosgerau J; Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1628-1639. PubMed ID: 31464485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values: Reservations and Recommendations for Applying p-Uniform and p-Curve.
    van Aert RC; Wicherts JM; van Assen MA
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(5):713-729. PubMed ID: 27694466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An unexpected influence of widely used significance thresholds on the distribution of reported P-values.
    Ridley J; Kolm N; Freckelton RP; Gage MJ
    J Evol Biol; 2007 May; 20(3):1082-9. PubMed ID: 17465918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantifying evidential value and selective reporting in recent and 10-year past psychophysiological literature: A pre-registered P-curve analysis.
    Carbine KA; Lindsey HM; Rodeback RE; Larson MJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Aug; 142():33-49. PubMed ID: 31195065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modelling publication bias and p-hacking.
    Moss J; De Bin R
    Biometrics; 2023 Mar; 79(1):319-331. PubMed ID: 34510407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. P-hacking in meta-analyses: A formalization and new meta-analytic methods.
    Mathur MB
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 May; 15(3):483-499. PubMed ID: 38273211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    Reisman S; Balboul M; Jones T
    PeerJ; 2019; 7():e6318. PubMed ID: 30697492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Monte-Carlo estimation of effect size distortion due to significance testing.
    Bradley MT; Smith D; Stoica G
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):837-42. PubMed ID: 12509183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.