These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

370 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23855496)

  • 21. p-Curve and p-Hacking in Observational Research.
    Bruns SB; Ioannidis JP
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149144. PubMed ID: 26886098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. P-curve won't do your laundry, but it will distinguish replicable from non-replicable findings in observational research: Comment on Bruns & Ioannidis (2016).
    Simonsohn U; Nelson LD; Simmons JP
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213454. PubMed ID: 30856227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey.
    Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA
    CMAJ; 2007 Apr; 176(8):1091-6. PubMed ID: 17420491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Publication bias in situ.
    Phillips CV
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Aug; 4():20. PubMed ID: 15296515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Conservative Tests under Satisficing Models of Publication Bias.
    McCrary J; Christensen G; Fanelli D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149590. PubMed ID: 26901834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Examining publication bias-a simulation-based evaluation of statistical tests on publication bias.
    Schneck A
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e4115. PubMed ID: 29204324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. You Could Have Just Asked: Reply to Francis (2012).
    Galak J; Meyvis T
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2012 Nov; 7(6):595-6. PubMed ID: 26168116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Why selective publication of statistically significant results can be effective.
    de Winter J; Happee R
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e66463. PubMed ID: 23840479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.
    De Oliveira GS; Chang R; Kendall MC; Fitzgerald PC; McCarthy RJ
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22344237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science.
    Head ML; Holman L; Lanfear R; Kahn AT; Jennions MD
    PLoS Biol; 2015 Mar; 13(3):e1002106. PubMed ID: 25768323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Updating meta-analyses leads to larger type I errors than publication bias.
    Borm GF; Donders AR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):825-830.e10. PubMed ID: 19136233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05.
    Masicampo EJ; Lalande DR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2271-9. PubMed ID: 22853650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Publication bias and the failure of replication in experimental psychology.
    Francis G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Dec; 19(6):975-91. PubMed ID: 23055145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Publication bias in trials other than RCTs].
    Timmer A
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 21530909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. P(rep) misestimates the probability of replication.
    Iverson GJ; Lee MD; Wagenmakers EJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):424-9. PubMed ID: 19293117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Human Fear Chemosignaling: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis.
    de Groot JHB; Smeets MAM
    Chem Senses; 2017 Oct; 42(8):663-673. PubMed ID: 28981822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
    Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Citation bias favoring statistically significant studies was present in medical research.
    Jannot AS; Agoritsas T; Gayet-Ageron A; Perneger TV
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Mar; 66(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 23347853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Putative null distributions corresponding to tests of differential expression in the Golden Spike dataset are intensity dependent.
    Gaile DP; Miecznikowski JC
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Apr; 8():105. PubMed ID: 17445265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.