96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23855551)
1. Reading aloud: does previous trial history modulate the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency?
O'Malley S; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1321-5. PubMed ID: 23855551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reading aloud: On the determinants of the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency.
White D; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):749-756. PubMed ID: 27936847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: extensions to Yap and Balota (2007).
O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 17352625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modulation of additive and interactive effects in lexical decision by trial history.
Masson ME; Kliegl R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):898-914. PubMed ID: 22774856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the joint effects of stimulus quality, regularity, and lexicality when reading aloud: new challenges.
Besner D; O'Malley S; Robidoux S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):750-64. PubMed ID: 20438270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Additive and interactive effects of stimulus degradation: no challenge for CDP+.
Ziegler JC; Perry C; Zorzi M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):306-11. PubMed ID: 19210104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Additive effects of word frequency and stimulus quality: the influence of trial history and data transformations.
Balota DA; Aschenbrenner AJ; Yap MJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1563-71. PubMed ID: 23565779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Additivity of factor effects in reading tasks is still a challenge for computational models: Reply to Ziegler, Perry, and Zorzi (2009).
Besner D; O'Malley S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):312-6. PubMed ID: 19210105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modulation of additive and interactive effects by trial history revisited.
Masson ME; Rabe MM; Kliegl R
Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):480-492. PubMed ID: 27787683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The relationship between knowing a word and reading it aloud in children's word reading development.
Nation K; Cocksey J
J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Jul; 103(3):296-308. PubMed ID: 19410262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the role of set when reading aloud: a dissociation between prelexical and lexical processing.
Paulitzki JR; Risko EF; O'Malley S; Stolz JA; Besner D
Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 19144540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reading aloud: qualitative differences in the relation between stimulus quality and word frequency as a function of context.
O'Malley S; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1400-11. PubMed ID: 18980404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Semantic involvement in reading aloud: evidence from a nonword training study.
McKay A; Davis C; Savage G; Castles A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1495-517. PubMed ID: 18980410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reading aloud: spelling-sound translation uses central attention.
O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Stolz JA; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):422-9. PubMed ID: 18315417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Additive and interactive effects on response time distributions in visual word recognition.
Yap MJ; Balota DA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):274-96. PubMed ID: 17352611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploring the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency: the influence of local and list-wide prime relatedness.
Scaltritti M; Balota DA; Peressotti F
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):91-107. PubMed ID: 22906041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Examining word processing via a megastudy of conditional reading aloud.
Cortese MJ; Yates M; Schock J; Vilks L
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2295-2313. PubMed ID: 30362414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses.
Yap MJ; Balota DA; Tse CS; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):495-513. PubMed ID: 18444751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is the go/no-go lexical decision task preferable to the yes/no task with developing readers?
Moret-Tatay C; Perea M
J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Sep; 110(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 21565360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
