These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23855551)

  • 21. Tracking the transition from sublexical to lexical processing: on the creation of orthographic and phonological lexical representations.
    Maloney E; Risko EF; O'Malley S; Besner D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):858-67. PubMed ID: 19107643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms?
    Brysbaert M; Cortese MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):545-59. PubMed ID: 20700859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sequential effects in the lexical decision task: the role of the item frequency of the previous trial.
    Perea M; Carreiras M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Apr; 56(3):385-401. PubMed ID: 12745840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The impact of lexical-semantic impairment and of executive dysfunction on the word reading performance of patients with probable Alzheimer dementia.
    Colombo L; Fonti C; Cappa S
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(9):1192-202. PubMed ID: 15178171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Constraints on computational models of basic processes in reading.
    Besner D; Wartak S; Robidoux S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Feb; 34(1):242-50. PubMed ID: 18248152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reading aloud: when the effect of stimulus quality distinguishes between cascaded and thresholded components.
    Blais C; Besner D
    Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 17725162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pupillary responses during lexical decisions vary with word frequency but not emotional valence.
    Kuchinke L; Võ ML; Hofmann M; Jacobs AM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Aug; 65(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 17532075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reading aloud and the question of intent.
    O'Malley S; Besner D
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Sep; 21(3):1298-310. PubMed ID: 22868215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Examining misses in reading aloud repeated words.
    Healy AF; Zangara TK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Mar; 70(3):373-377. PubMed ID: 27467274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect.
    Stenneken P; van Eimeren L; Keller I; Jacobs AM; Kerkhoff G
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():166-78. PubMed ID: 18054900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reading aloud: evidence for contextual control over lexical activation.
    Ferguson R; Robidoux S; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):499-507. PubMed ID: 19331503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The bigram trough hypothesis and the syllable number effect in lexical decision.
    Muncer SJ; Knight DC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2221-30. PubMed ID: 22804754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. When benefits outweigh costs: reconsidering "automatic" phonological recoding when reading aloud.
    Robidoux S; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Jun; 65(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 21668092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. You can't Stroop a lexical decision: is semantic processing fundamentally facilitative?
    Schmidt JR; Cheesman J; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun; 67(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 23205510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Phonological decoding or direct access? Regularity effects in lexical decisions of Grade 3 and 4 children.
    Schmalz X; Marinus E; Castles A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(2):338-46. PubMed ID: 22905801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On the joint effects of repetition and stimulus quality in lexical decision: looking to the past for a new way forward.
    Blais C; O'Malley S; Besner D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Dec; 64(12):2368-82. PubMed ID: 21819278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lexical decision in children: sublexical processing or lexical search?
    van den Boer M; de Jong PF; Haentjens-van Meeteren MM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1214-28. PubMed ID: 22489669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Length effect in reading and lexical decision: evidence from skilled readers and a developmental dyslexic participant.
    Juphard A; Carbonnel S; Valdois S
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):332-40. PubMed ID: 15177808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The cross-script length effect: further evidence challenging PDP models of reading aloud.
    Rastle K; Havelka J; Wydell TN; Coltheart M; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 19210093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Imageability and age of acquisition effects in disyllabic word recognition.
    Cortese MJ; Schock J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):946-72. PubMed ID: 23030642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.