These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23856838)

  • 1. A comparison of ThinPrep Imager-assisted with manual screening, and its place in the New Zealand cervical cancer screening program.
    Yeong ML; Pringle E; Stewart J; Retter E
    Pathology; 2013 Aug; 45(5):474-7. PubMed ID: 23856838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of ThinPrep Integrated Imager-Assisted Screening versus Manual Screening of ThinPrep Liquid-Based Cytology Specimens.
    Tanaka K; Aoki D; Tozawa-Ono A; Suzuki N; Takamatsu K; Nakamura M; Tsunoda H; Seino S; Kobayashi N; Shirayama T; Takahashi F
    Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(5):486-491. PubMed ID: 32535593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Concordance between original screening and final diagnosis using imager vs. manual screen of cervical liquid-based cytology slides.
    Pacheco MC; Conley RC; Pennington DW; Bishop JW
    Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(5):575-8. PubMed ID: 18833820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementation and evaluation of a new automated interactive image analysis system.
    Bolger N; Heffron C; Regan I; Sweeney M; Kinsella S; McKeown M; Creighton G; Russell J; O'Leary J
    Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(5):483-91. PubMed ID: 17017432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Switching from neural networks (PAPNET) to the Imager (Hologic) for computer-assisted screening.
    Boon ME; Ouwerkerk-Noordam E; Meijer-Marres EM; Bontekoe TR
    Acta Cytol; 2011; 55(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 21325801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility of the Thin Prep Imaging System® in the detection of squamous intraepithelial abnormalities on retrospective evaluation: can we trust the imager?
    Barroeta JE; Reilly ME; Steinhoff MM; Lawrence WD
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Feb; 40(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 22246928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of computer-assisted and manual screening of cervical cytology.
    Lozano R
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jan; 104(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 16959306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementation of the ThinPrep imaging system in a high-volume metropolitan laboratory.
    Miller FS; Nagel LE; Kenny-Moynihan MB
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Apr; 35(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 17351933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of unsuspected abnormalities by PAPNET-assisted review.
    Mitchell H; Medley G
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):260-4. PubMed ID: 9479349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the AutoCyte SCREEN system in a clinical cytopathology laboratory.
    Bishop JW; Cheuvront DA; Sims KL
    Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 10740595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multicenter comparison of manual and automated screening of AutoCyte gynecologic preparations.
    Bishop JW; Kaufman RH; Taylor DA
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 9987448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assisted primary screening using the automated ThinPrep Imaging System.
    Biscotti CV; Dawson AE; Dziura B; Galup L; Darragh T; Rahemtulla A; Wills-Frank L
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb; 123(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 15842055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of the ThinPrep Imaging System for internal quality control of cervical cytology.
    Heard T; Chandra A; Culora G; Gupta SS; Herbert A; Morgan M
    Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 22937891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective parallel randomized trial of the MultiCyte™ ThinPrep(®) imaging system: the Scottish experience.
    Palmer TJ; Nicoll SM; McKean ME; Park AJ; Bishop D; Baker L; Imrie JE
    Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 22616770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting screening sensitivity from workload in gynecologic cytology: a review.
    Renshaw AA; Elsheikh TM
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Nov; 39(11):832-6. PubMed ID: 21994194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid prescreening is as effective at reducing screening error as postscreening with the FocalPoint automated screening device.
    Wilgenbusch H; Mueller G; Neal M; Renshaw AA
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Nov; 39(11):818-21. PubMed ID: 20949451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prevalence of Abnormal Cervical Cytology in HIVNegative Women Participating in a Cervical Cancer Screening Program in Calmette Hospital, Cambodia.
    Hav M; Eav S; Heang N; Pich P; Lim D; Leang V; Korn A; Lay S; Pluot M; Kruy L
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(7):3101-3. PubMed ID: 27509936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Groundbreaking Work Which Laid the Foundation for Mass Screening in Cervical Cytology in Japan.
    Osamura RY
    Acta Cytol; 2017; 61(4-5):299-304. PubMed ID: 28693014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rapid pre-screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control in a cervical screening programme.
    Tavares SB; de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG
    Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 18476988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is there a role for the thinprep imaging system in reporting anal cytology?
    Margaret Roberts J; Jin F; Ekman D; Kay Adams M; Lindsay McDonald R; Kathleen Thurloe J; Richards A; Mary Poynten I; Law C; Kincaid Fairley C; John Hillman R; Tabrizi SN; Marie Cornall A; James Templeton D; Marie Garland S; Edwin Grulich A; Farnsworth A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 May; 44(5):384-8. PubMed ID: 26876374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.