178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23857151)
1. Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values and prognostic factors of breast cancer.
Kamitani T; Matsuo Y; Yabuuchi H; Fujita N; Nagao M; Jinnouchi M; Yonezawa M; Yamasaki Y; Tokunaga E; Kubo M; Yamamoto H; Yoshiura T; Honda H
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2013; 12(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 23857151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values of invasive ductal carcinoma and pathologic factors on diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 Tesla.
Park SH; Choi HY; Hahn SY
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jan; 41(1):175-82. PubMed ID: 24353241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diffusion-weighted imaging and (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer: Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient and maximum standardized uptake values with prognostic factors.
Karan B; Pourbagher A; Torun N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 26663655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0t: Correlation with prognostic factors and subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma.
Kim EJ; Kim SH; Park GE; Kang BJ; Song BJ; Kim YJ; Lee D; Ahn H; Kim I; Son YH; Grimm R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(6):1666-78. PubMed ID: 25919239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurement obtained by 3.0Tesla MRI as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness in breast cancer.
Durando M; Gennaro L; Cho GY; Giri DD; Gnanasigamani MM; Patil S; Sutton EJ; Deasy JO; Morris EA; Thakur SB
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1651-8. PubMed ID: 27501902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer: correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic factors.
Kim SH; Cha ES; Kim HS; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jung JH; Park YG; Suh YJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 30(3):615-20. PubMed ID: 19711411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficiency values on diffusion-weighted imaging with prognostic factors for breast cancer.
Choi SY; Chang YW; Park HJ; Kim HJ; Hong SS; Seo DY
Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):e474-9. PubMed ID: 22128125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Added value of mean and entropy of apparent diffusion coefficient values for evaluating histologic phenotypes of invasive ductal breast cancer with MR imaging.
Suo S; Zhang D; Cheng F; Cao M; Hua J; Lu J; Xu J
Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1425-1434. PubMed ID: 30116958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimum apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting lymphovascular invasion in invasive cervical cancer.
Yang W; Qiang JW; Tian HP; Chen B; Wang AJ; Zhao JG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jun; 45(6):1771-1779. PubMed ID: 27859961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diffusion-weighted imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal intensity in correlation with histologic findings.
Woodhams R; Kakita S; Hata H; Iwabuchi K; Umeoka S; Mountford CE; Hatabu H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 193(1):260-6. PubMed ID: 19542422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of the SUVmax of FDG-PET and ADC values of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with pathologic prognostic factors in breast carcinoma.
Kitajima K; Yamano T; Fukushima K; Miyoshi Y; Hirota S; Kawanaka Y; Miya M; Doi H; Yamakado K; Hirota S
Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 27130054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Apparent diffusion coefficient in estrogen receptor-positive and lymph node-negative invasive breast cancers at 3.0T DW-MRI: A potential predictor for an oncotype Dx test recurrence score.
Thakur SB; Durando M; Milans S; Cho GY; Gennaro L; Sutton EJ; Giri D; Morris EA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 47(2):401-409. PubMed ID: 28640531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Apparent diffusion coefficient cannot predict molecular subtype and lymph node metastases in invasive breast cancer: a multicenter analysis.
Surov A; Chang YW; Li L; Martincich L; Partridge SC; Kim JY; Wienke A
BMC Cancer; 2019 Nov; 19(1):1043. PubMed ID: 31690273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of tumor morphology on diffusion-weighted (DWI) breast MRI: Diagnostic value of reduced field of view DWI.
Barentsz MW; Taviani V; Chang JM; Ikeda DM; Miyake KK; Banerjee S; van den Bosch MA; Hargreaves BA; Daniel BL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(6):1656-65. PubMed ID: 25914178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association among T2 signal intensity, necrosis, ADC and Ki-67 in estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative invasive ductal carcinoma.
Kim SY; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Koo JS; Kim SG; Kim MJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Dec; 54():176-182. PubMed ID: 30172938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Triple-negative invasive breast cancer on dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with other breast cancer subtypes.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Chung J; Kim JA; Kim EK
Eur Radiol; 2012 Aug; 22(8):1724-34. PubMed ID: 22527371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is there different correlation with prognostic factors between "non-mass" and "mass" type invasive ductal breast cancers?
Jiang L; Zhou Y; Wang Z; Lu X; Chen M; Zhou C
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1404-9. PubMed ID: 23540946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of perfusion parameters on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with prognostic factors and subtypes of breast cancers.
Koo HR; Cho N; Song IC; Kim H; Chang JM; Yi A; Yun BL; Moon WK
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jul; 36(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 22392859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging findings with prognostic factors in invasive ductal carcinoma.
Jeh SK; Kim SH; Kim HS; Kang BJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 33(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 21182127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic performance of minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value in differentiating the invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma
Zhao S; Shao G; Chen P; Li L; Yang Y; Zhao X; Guo W
J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(4):871-875. PubMed ID: 31436245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
