These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23857151)
1. Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values and prognostic factors of breast cancer. Kamitani T; Matsuo Y; Yabuuchi H; Fujita N; Nagao M; Jinnouchi M; Yonezawa M; Yamasaki Y; Tokunaga E; Kubo M; Yamamoto H; Yoshiura T; Honda H Magn Reson Med Sci; 2013; 12(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 23857151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values of invasive ductal carcinoma and pathologic factors on diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 Tesla. Park SH; Choi HY; Hahn SY J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jan; 41(1):175-82. PubMed ID: 24353241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diffusion-weighted imaging and (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer: Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient and maximum standardized uptake values with prognostic factors. Karan B; Pourbagher A; Torun N J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 26663655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0t: Correlation with prognostic factors and subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma. Kim EJ; Kim SH; Park GE; Kang BJ; Song BJ; Kim YJ; Lee D; Ahn H; Kim I; Son YH; Grimm R J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(6):1666-78. PubMed ID: 25919239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurement obtained by 3.0Tesla MRI as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness in breast cancer. Durando M; Gennaro L; Cho GY; Giri DD; Gnanasigamani MM; Patil S; Sutton EJ; Deasy JO; Morris EA; Thakur SB Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1651-8. PubMed ID: 27501902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer: correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic factors. Kim SH; Cha ES; Kim HS; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jung JH; Park YG; Suh YJ J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Sep; 30(3):615-20. PubMed ID: 19711411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficiency values on diffusion-weighted imaging with prognostic factors for breast cancer. Choi SY; Chang YW; Park HJ; Kim HJ; Hong SS; Seo DY Br J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 85(1016):e474-9. PubMed ID: 22128125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Added value of mean and entropy of apparent diffusion coefficient values for evaluating histologic phenotypes of invasive ductal breast cancer with MR imaging. Suo S; Zhang D; Cheng F; Cao M; Hua J; Lu J; Xu J Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1425-1434. PubMed ID: 30116958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimum apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting lymphovascular invasion in invasive cervical cancer. Yang W; Qiang JW; Tian HP; Chen B; Wang AJ; Zhao JG J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jun; 45(6):1771-1779. PubMed ID: 27859961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diffusion-weighted imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal intensity in correlation with histologic findings. Woodhams R; Kakita S; Hata H; Iwabuchi K; Umeoka S; Mountford CE; Hatabu H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 193(1):260-6. PubMed ID: 19542422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of the SUVmax of FDG-PET and ADC values of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with pathologic prognostic factors in breast carcinoma. Kitajima K; Yamano T; Fukushima K; Miyoshi Y; Hirota S; Kawanaka Y; Miya M; Doi H; Yamakado K; Hirota S Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 27130054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Apparent diffusion coefficient in estrogen receptor-positive and lymph node-negative invasive breast cancers at 3.0T DW-MRI: A potential predictor for an oncotype Dx test recurrence score. Thakur SB; Durando M; Milans S; Cho GY; Gennaro L; Sutton EJ; Giri D; Morris EA J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 47(2):401-409. PubMed ID: 28640531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Apparent diffusion coefficient cannot predict molecular subtype and lymph node metastases in invasive breast cancer: a multicenter analysis. Surov A; Chang YW; Li L; Martincich L; Partridge SC; Kim JY; Wienke A BMC Cancer; 2019 Nov; 19(1):1043. PubMed ID: 31690273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of tumor morphology on diffusion-weighted (DWI) breast MRI: Diagnostic value of reduced field of view DWI. Barentsz MW; Taviani V; Chang JM; Ikeda DM; Miyake KK; Banerjee S; van den Bosch MA; Hargreaves BA; Daniel BL J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(6):1656-65. PubMed ID: 25914178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association among T2 signal intensity, necrosis, ADC and Ki-67 in estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative invasive ductal carcinoma. Kim SY; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Koo JS; Kim SG; Kim MJ Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Dec; 54():176-182. PubMed ID: 30172938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Triple-negative invasive breast cancer on dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with other breast cancer subtypes. Youk JH; Son EJ; Chung J; Kim JA; Kim EK Eur Radiol; 2012 Aug; 22(8):1724-34. PubMed ID: 22527371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is there different correlation with prognostic factors between "non-mass" and "mass" type invasive ductal breast cancers? Jiang L; Zhou Y; Wang Z; Lu X; Chen M; Zhou C Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1404-9. PubMed ID: 23540946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of perfusion parameters on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with prognostic factors and subtypes of breast cancers. Koo HR; Cho N; Song IC; Kim H; Chang JM; Yi A; Yun BL; Moon WK J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jul; 36(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 22392859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging findings with prognostic factors in invasive ductal carcinoma. Jeh SK; Kim SH; Kim HS; Kang BJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 33(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 21182127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic performance of minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value in differentiating the invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma Zhao S; Shao G; Chen P; Li L; Yang Y; Zhao X; Guo W J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(4):871-875. PubMed ID: 31436245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]