These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. The physical-mechanical performance of the new Ketac Molar Easymix compared to commercially available glass ionomer restoratives. Peez R; Frank S J Dent; 2006 Sep; 34(8):582-7. PubMed ID: 16581174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Consensus on glass-ionomer cement thresholds for restorative indications. de Lima Navarro MF; Pascotto RC; Borges AFS; Soares CJ; Raggio DP; Rios D; Bresciani E; Molina GF; Ngo HC; Miletić I; Frencken J; Wang L; Menezes-Silva R; Puppin-Rontani RM; de Carvalho RM; Gurgan S; Leal SC; Tüzüner T; Fagundes TC; Nicholson JW; Sidhu SK J Dent; 2021 Apr; 107():103609. PubMed ID: 33610589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Survival of multiple-surface ART restorations using a zinc-reinforced glass-ionomer restorative after 2 years: A randomized triple-blind clinical trial. Mobarak E; El-Deeb H; Daifalla LE; Ghaly M; Mustafa M; Sabry D; Fatah H; Mulder J; Creugers NHJ; Frencken JE Dent Mater; 2019 Sep; 35(9):e185-e192. PubMed ID: 31235189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Tensile bond strengths of five luting agents to two CAD-CAM restorative materials and enamel. Chang JC; Hart DA; Estey AW; Chan JT J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jul; 90(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 12869970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diametral Tensile Strength, Flexural Strength, and Surface Microhardness of Bioactive Bulk Fill Restorative. Alrahlah A J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jan; 19(1):13-19. PubMed ID: 29358529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months. Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of the flexural strength of six reinforced restorative materials. Cohen BI; Volovich Y; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS Gen Dent; 2001; 49(5):484-8. PubMed ID: 12017792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Metal-reinforced glass ionomers: their flexural and bond strengths to tooth substrates. Tjan AH; Morgan DL J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Feb; 59(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 3278094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Compressive strength of some polyalkenoates with or without dental amalgam alloy incorporation. Beyls HM; Verbeeck RM; Martens LC; Lemaitre L Dent Mater; 1991 Jul; 7(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 1813336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparative study of three glass ionomer base materials. Burgess JO; Barghi N; Chan DC; Hummert T Am J Dent; 1993 Jun; 6(3):137-41. PubMed ID: 8240775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Study of the Mechanical Properties of the Novel Zirconia-reinforced Glass lonomer Cement. Chalissery VP; Marwah N; Almuhaiza M; AlZailai AM; Chalisserry EP; Bhandi SH; Anil S J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 May; 17(5):394-8. PubMed ID: 27443366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of ultrasound application during setting on the mechanical properties of high viscous glass-ionomers used for ART restorations. Daifalla LE; Mobarak EH J Adv Res; 2015 Nov; 6(6):805-10. PubMed ID: 26644916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Physical-mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements indicated for atraumatic restorative treatment. Bonifácio CC; Kleverlaan CJ; Raggio DP; Werner A; de Carvalho RC; van Amerongen WE Aust Dent J; 2009 Sep; 54(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 19709111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]