These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2385845)

  • 1. Densitometric evaluation of seven dental film processing solutions.
    Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Feb; 45(2):31-3. PubMed ID: 2385845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Densitometric evaluation of intra-oral radiographic film-processing solution combinations.
    Swart TJ; Seeliger JE
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1989 Jul; 44(7):281-3. PubMed ID: 2637510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of varying processing solution temperature on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of dental film.
    Matthee MJ; Becker PJ; Seeliger JE
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Dec; 45(12):525-8. PubMed ID: 2098942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Densitometric evaluation of four rapid dental film processing solutions.
    Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1991 Sep; 46(9):467-9. PubMed ID: 1820681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Densitometric evaluation of three intra-oral radiographic films.
    Seeliger JE; Prinsloo JJ
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1989 May; 44(5):177-9. PubMed ID: 2635441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of time and exposure to air on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of three rapid dental film processing solutions.
    Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE; Prinsloo NJ; Swart NG
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1993 Jan; 48(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 9511608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitometric evaluation of four dental X-ray films using five processing solutions.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10522195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Densitometric properties of rapid manual processing solutions: abbreviated versus complete rapid processing.
    Geist JR; Gleason MJ
    J Endod; 1995 Apr; 21(4):180-4. PubMed ID: 7673817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of developer exhaustion on the sensitometric properties of four dental films.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10522196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characteristics of Kodak Insight, an F-speed intraoral film.
    Ludlow JB; Platin E; Mol A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):120-9. PubMed ID: 11174582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal processing of Ektaspeed dental film.
    Fjellström CA; Fredholm U; Julin P; Rehnmark S
    Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(4):137-43. PubMed ID: 3466376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developing solutions for dental X-ray processors.
    Hedin M
    Swed Dent J; 1989; 13(6):261-5. PubMed ID: 2603130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Densitometric evaluation of three x-ray films with five different developing solutions.
    Kaffe I; Littner MM; Tamse A; Kuspet ME
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Feb; 57(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 6583629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Densitometric evaluation of four radiographic processing solutions.
    Akdeniz BG; Lomçali G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9656875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of developer age on diagnostic accuracy: a study using assessment of endodontic file length.
    Syriopoulos K; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Sep; 28(5):311-5. PubMed ID: 10490751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of a new dental X-ray film, Agfa Gevaert Dentus M4, with Kodak Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed dental X-ray films.
    Svenson B; Lindvall AM; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 8508944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the quality of radiographic processing in general dental practice.
    Thornley PH; Stewardson DA; Rout PG; Burke FJ
    Br Dent J; 2006 May; 200(9):515-9; discussion 503. PubMed ID: 16703095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Efficiency of the Thai processing solution in clinical practice].
    Chongruk C
    J Dent Assoc Thai; 1989; 39(6):219-25. PubMed ID: 2640671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.