These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2385845)

  • 21. E-speed dental films processed with rapid chemistry: a comparison with D-speed film.
    Kaffe I; Gratt BM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Sep; 64(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 3477753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sensitometric comparison of speed group E and F dental radiographic films.
    Geist JR; Brand JW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 11420626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of developer depletion on image quality of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus films.
    Casanova MS; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 15314003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparative physical evaluation of four X-ray films.
    Egyed M; Shearer DR
    Radiol Manage; 1981 Sep; 3(4):11-20. PubMed ID: 10253292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is E-speed dental film more sensitive to storage than D-speed dental film?
    Petersson A; Lindh C; Nilsson M
    Swed Dent J; 1987; 11(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 3480614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Development of the automatic dental X-ray film processor].
    Bai J; Chen H
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 1999 Jul; 23(4):214-6. PubMed ID: 12583065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of glove powder on radiographic quality.
    Hubar JS; Etzel KR; Dietrich CB
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1991 Oct; 57(10):790-2. PubMed ID: 1742663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Comparative study of very high speed dental films].
    Benz C
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Sep; 44(9):728-30. PubMed ID: 2637857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Densitometric evaluation of the effect of light on radiographic films after developing interruption].
    Rovigatti E
    Dens (Curitiba); 1986; 1(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 3483173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of solution depletion on films developed in the Peri-Pro automatic processor.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jan; 57(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 6582420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of storage conditions on film characteristics of Ektaspeed plus and Ultra-speed films.
    Platin E; Nesbit SP; Ludlow JB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Feb; 130(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 10036844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sensitometric evaluation of a new F-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 11175270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The evaluation of effect of developer age in the detection of approximal caries using three speed dental x-ray films: an in-vitro study.
    Madalli VB; Annigeri RG; Basavaraddi SM
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Mar; 8(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 24783146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Some rapid processing solutions. Influence on basic blacking, contrast and speed of dental x-ray film].
    Gröndahl HG; Lysell L
    Sver Tandlakarforb Tidn; 1970 Mar; 62(6):274-81. PubMed ID: 5266923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Optimal dental radiography by means of expert film processing].
    Horn C
    Stomatol DDR; 1978 Oct; 28(10):739-46. PubMed ID: 282693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of six intra-oral X-ray films.
    Conover GL; Hildebolt CF; Anthony D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 8617390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The use of a test phantom in step-shaped forms (test steps) for the clarification of different problem situations in x-ray diagnosis. 1. The use of test steps for the estimation of image quality after modified darkroom technics].
    Parisot M
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1990 Mar; 103(3):92-4. PubMed ID: 2317188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sensitometric and image quality performance of "rapid" intraoral film processing techniques.
    Czajka J; Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):49-58. PubMed ID: 8785621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Grassl U; Schulze RK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Characteristics of high-speed dental X-ray film--regarding AGFA-GEVAERT DENTUS M-2 (SOFTPAC)].
    Watanabe Y; Yamashita Y; Hoshino N; Hoshino Y; Yamada H; Niwa K; Kanai Y
    Josai Shika Daigaku Kiyo; 1984; 13(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 6596967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.