These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23858536)
1. In the dark. Nature; 2013 Jul; 499(7457):125-6. PubMed ID: 23858536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct. Sovacool BK Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Whistles blow in vain on bad practice in German research. Abbott A Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6964):218. PubMed ID: 14628012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sociology. Scientific misconduct: do the punishments fit the crime? Redman BK; Merz JF Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):775. PubMed ID: 18687942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Health department lays down the law on scientific misconduct. Wadman M Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6985):786. PubMed ID: 15103337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Sanctions against fraudsters and the situation of whistleblowers with respect to the law]. Moret-Bailly J Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):867-71. PubMed ID: 22771024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Research ethics: 3 ways to blow the whistle. Yong E; Ledford H; Van Noorden R Nature; 2013 Nov; 503(7477):454-7. PubMed ID: 24284713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Regulation of scientific misconduct in federally funded research. Steinberg NA South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 2000; 10(1):39-105. PubMed ID: 12953675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism. Wittmaack K Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]