These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23858536)

  • 1. In the dark.
    Nature; 2013 Jul; 499(7457):125-6. PubMed ID: 23858536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
    Sovacool BK
    Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Whistles blow in vain on bad practice in German research.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6964):218. PubMed ID: 14628012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sociology. Scientific misconduct: do the punishments fit the crime?
    Redman BK; Merz JF
    Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):775. PubMed ID: 18687942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repairing research integrity.
    Titus SL; Wells JA; Rhoades LJ
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):980-2. PubMed ID: 18563131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health department lays down the law on scientific misconduct.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6985):786. PubMed ID: 15103337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misconduct? It's all academic..
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):240-1. PubMed ID: 17230159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Sanctions against fraudsters and the situation of whistleblowers with respect to the law].
    Moret-Bailly J
    Presse Med; 2012 Sep; 41(9 Pt 1):867-71. PubMed ID: 22771024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Research ethics: 3 ways to blow the whistle.
    Yong E; Ledford H; Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2013 Nov; 503(7477):454-7. PubMed ID: 24284713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regulation of scientific misconduct in federally funded research.
    Steinberg NA
    South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 2000; 10(1):39-105. PubMed ID: 12953675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
    Wittmaack K
    Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Solutions, not scapegoats.
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):957. PubMed ID: 18563095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fraud in research, 1986-1992: an annotated bibliography.
    Anderson J
    J Infor Ethics; 1994; 3(2):64-89. PubMed ID: 11656481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Research ethics. Germany gets in step with scientific misconduct rules.
    Bostanci A
    Science; 2002 Jun; 296(5574):1778. PubMed ID: 12052923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific Misconduct.
    Gross C
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2016; 67():693-711. PubMed ID: 26273897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Research: Uncovering misconduct.
    Gewin V
    Nature; 2012 May; 485(7396):137-9. PubMed ID: 22563582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scientific misconduct. Truth and consequences.
    Couzin J
    Science; 2006 Sep; 313(5791):1222-6. PubMed ID: 16946046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fraud claims shake German complacency.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6635):750. PubMed ID: 9194549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Research fraud: how to do it and how to stop it.
    Turin L
    BMJ; 2014 Aug; 349():g5221. PubMed ID: 25145696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Plagiarism.
    Droller MJ; ; Bahnson RR; Lerner SP; Schoenberg M; Thalmann GA
    Urol Oncol; 2012 Sep; 30(5):547-8. PubMed ID: 23021554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.