102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23858747)
1. [Study on multi-level fractal features extraction method of breast mass].
Ke L; Zhang X; Kang Y
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 30(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 23858747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers.
Mavroforakis ME; Georgiou HV; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
Artif Intell Med; 2006 Jun; 37(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 16716579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization and classification of tumor lesions using computerized fractal-based texture analysis and support vector machines in digital mammograms.
Guo Q; Shao J; Ruiz VF
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2009 Jan; 4(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 20033598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Integration of morphological preprocessing and fractal based feature extraction with recursive feature elimination for skin lesion types classification.
Chatterjee S; Dey D; Munshi S
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Sep; 178():201-218. PubMed ID: 31416550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Classification of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses on Mammograms for Large Datasets using Core Vector Machines.
Jebamony J; Jacob D
Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(6):703-710. PubMed ID: 32723242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Classification of breast regions as mass and non-mass based on digital mammograms using taxonomic indexes and SVM.
Soares Sérvulo de Oliveira F; Oseas de Carvalho Filho A; Corrêa Silva A; Cardoso de Paiva A; Gattass M
Comput Biol Med; 2015 Feb; 57():42-53. PubMed ID: 25528696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using multiscale texture and density features for near-term breast cancer risk analysis.
Sun W; Tseng TL; Qian W; Zhang J; Saltzstein EC; Zheng B; Lure F; Yu H; Zhou S
Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):2853-62. PubMed ID: 26127038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiresolution local binary pattern texture analysis combined with variable selection for application to false-positive reduction in computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms.
Choi JY; Ro YM
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):7029-52. PubMed ID: 23053352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated Detection and Classification of Microcalcification Clusters with Enhanced Preprocessing and Fractal Analysis.
Gowri V; Valluvan KR; Chamundeeswari VV
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Nov; 19(11):3093-3098. PubMed ID: 30486547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automatic detection of microcalcifications with multi-fractal spectrum.
Ding Y; Dai H; Zhang H
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3049-54. PubMed ID: 25227013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast masses in mammography classification with local contour features.
Li H; Meng X; Wang T; Tang Y; Yin Y
Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Apr; 16(1):44. PubMed ID: 28410616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Efficient Approach for Automated Mass Segmentation and Classification in Mammograms.
Dong M; Lu X; Ma Y; Guo Y; Ma Y; Wang K
J Digit Imaging; 2015 Oct; 28(5):613-25. PubMed ID: 25776767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Decision support system for breast cancer detection using mammograms.
Ganesan K; Acharya RU; Chua CK; Min LC; Mathew B; Thomas AK
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):721-32. PubMed ID: 23636749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A statistical based feature extraction method for breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiresolution representation.
Meselhy Eltoukhy M; Faye I; Belhaouari Samir B
Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 22115076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A study on the computerized fractal analysis of architectural distortion in screening mammograms.
Tourassi GD; Delong DM; Floyd CE
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1299-312. PubMed ID: 16481695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An efficient fractal method for detection and diagnosis of breast masses in mammograms.
Beheshti SM; AhmadiNoubari H; Fatemizadeh E; Khalili M
J Digit Imaging; 2014 Oct; 27(5):661-9. PubMed ID: 24777687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multi-scaled morphological features for the characterization of mammographic masses using statistical classification schemes.
Georgiou H; Mavroforakis M; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
Artif Intell Med; 2007 Sep; 41(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 17714924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Fractal analysis in the diagnosis of breast tumors].
Crişan DA; Lesaru M; Dobrescu R; Vasilescu C
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2007; 102(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 17410726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image segmentation feature selection and pattern classification for mammographic microcalcifications.
Fu JC; Lee SK; Wong ST; Yeh JY; Wang AH; Wu HK
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2005 Sep; 29(6):419-29. PubMed ID: 16002263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Classification of breast ultrasound images using fractal feature.
Chen DR; Chang RF; Chen CJ; Ho MF; Kuo SJ; Chen ST; Hung SJ; Moon WK
Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 15967313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
