These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23858826)
1. Number-needed-to-treat: translating benefits and risks of therapy from clinical trials to a clinical encounter. Ragan P; Quincy B J Physician Assist Educ; 2013; 24(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 23858826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigational treatments. How strict should we be? Eddy DM JAMA; 1997 Jul; 278(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 9218650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. General practice by numbers: presentation to final outcome. Shapley M; Mansell G; Barraclough K; Croft P Br J Gen Pract; 2013 Apr; 63(609):e300-2. PubMed ID: 23540487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Preventive-Pill Paradox: How Shared Decision Making Could Increase Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality. Diprose W; Verster F Circulation; 2016 Nov; 134(21):1599-1600. PubMed ID: 27881503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Number needed to treat (NNT). Cordell WH Ann Emerg Med; 1999 Apr; 33(4):433-6. PubMed ID: 10092722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using levels of evidence to compare clinical impact from research. Ahmad T; Chinoy MA; Tayyab M J Evid Based Med; 2014 Feb; 7(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 25155565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Show me the evidence: using number needed to treat. Citrome L South Med J; 2007 Sep; 100(9):881-4. PubMed ID: 17902287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Users' guides to the medical literature: XX. Integrating research evidence with the care of the individual patient. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. McAlister FA; Straus SE; Guyatt GH; Haynes RB JAMA; 2000 Jun; 283(21):2829-36. PubMed ID: 10838653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When does a difference make a difference? Interpretation of number needed to treat, number needed to harm, and likelihood to be helped or harmed. Citrome L; Ketter TA Int J Clin Pract; 2013 May; 67(5):407-11. PubMed ID: 23574101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Four important steps toward 21st century care for patients with cancer. McClellan M; Benner JS Oncologist; 2009 Apr; 14(4):313-6. PubMed ID: 19365095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The practice of clinical medicine as an art and as a science. Saunders J Med Humanit; 2000 Jun; 26(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 12484313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [The number needed to treat (NNT) and the number needed to harm (NNH)]. Suter K; Briel M; Günther J Med Monatsschr Pharm; 2015 Mar; 38(3):103-6. PubMed ID: 26364396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nurse practitioners and physician assistants in the intensive care unit: an evidence-based review. Kleinpell RM; Ely EW; Grabenkort R Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2888-97. PubMed ID: 18766097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Epistemic humility and medical practice: translating epistemic categories into ethical obligations. Schwab A J Med Philos; 2012 Feb; 37(1):28-48. PubMed ID: 22241866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Weighing risks and benefits in treating the individual patient. Sinclair JC Clin Perinatol; 2003 Jun; 30(2):251-68. PubMed ID: 12875353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The neck is not the back: obvious, but the research gap should be reduced. Negrini S Eura Medicophys; 2007 Mar; 43(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 17369781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Relative and absolute benefits: main results should be reported in absolute terms. Fisher JD; Ector HE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Aug; 30(8):935-7. PubMed ID: 17669073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Statistics for the nonstatistician: A primer for reading clinical studies. Mansi IA South Med J; 2012 Mar; 105(3):120-5. PubMed ID: 22392206 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]