These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23858956)

  • 1. Cognitive processing of scrambled faces.
    Rakover SS; Cahlon B
    Am J Psychol; 2013; 126(2):235-44. PubMed ID: 23858956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive Processing of Scrambled Faces: Effects of Instructions and Task.
    Rakover SS
    Am J Psychol; 2015; 128(3):379-86. PubMed ID: 26442344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The face inversion effect--parts and wholes: individual features and their configuration.
    Civile C; McLaren RP; McLaren IP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):728-46. PubMed ID: 24063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition.
    Leder H; Bruce V
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):513-36. PubMed ID: 10881616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A contextual effect of 2nd-order configural processing of non-face objects by non-experts.
    Matheson HE; McMullen PA
    Perception; 2009; 38(7):1072-86. PubMed ID: 19764308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial-frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces.
    Watier NN; Collin CA; Boutet I
    Perception; 2010; 39(4):502-13. PubMed ID: 20514998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
    Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of novel faces: the parts have it!
    Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1660-73. PubMed ID: 18265846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces.
    Leder H; Candrian G; Huber O; Bruce V
    Perception; 2001; 30(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 11257979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Configural processing and face viewpoint.
    McKone E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):310-27. PubMed ID: 18377173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Emotion recognition: the role of featural and configural face information.
    Bombari D; Schmid PC; Schmid Mast M; Birri S; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2426-42. PubMed ID: 23679155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The ups and downs of face perception: evidence for holistic encoding of upright and inverted faces.
    Murray JE
    Perception; 2004; 33(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 15222387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of scrambling upright and inverted faces on the N170.
    Civile C; Elchlepp H; McLaren R; Galang CM; Lavric A; McLaren I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2464-2476. PubMed ID: 30362407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Featural, configural, and holistic face-processing strategies evoke different scan patterns.
    Bombari D; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Perception; 2009; 38(10):1508-21. PubMed ID: 19950482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EEG phase synchrony differences across visual perception conditions may depend on recording and analysis methods.
    Trujillo LT; Peterson MA; Kaszniak AW; Allen JJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan; 116(1):172-89. PubMed ID: 15589196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Face processing in 8-month-old infants: evidence for configural and analytical processing.
    Schwarzer G; Zauner N
    Vision Res; 2003 Dec; 43(26):2783-93. PubMed ID: 14568095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification.
    Gaspar C; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Dec; 48(28):2817-26. PubMed ID: 18835403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Processing of configural and componential information in face-selective cortical areas.
    Zhao M; Cheung SH; Wong AC; Rhodes G; Chan EK; Chan WW; Hayward WG
    Cogn Neurosci; 2014; 5(3-4):160-7. PubMed ID: 24784503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence for holistic processing of faces viewed as photographic negatives.
    Hole GJ; George PA; Dunsmore V
    Perception; 1999; 28(3):341-59. PubMed ID: 10615472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.