These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23859107)

  • 1. [Propensity scores in observational research].
    Groenwold RH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2013; 157(29):A6179. PubMed ID: 23859107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the E-value in the presence of bias amplification: a simulation study.
    Barrette E; Higuera L; Wherry K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):79. PubMed ID: 38539082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An overview of propensity score matching methods for clustered data.
    Langworthy B; Wu Y; Wang M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Apr; 32(4):641-655. PubMed ID: 36426585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applying Propensity Score Methods in Clinical Research in Neurology.
    Austin PC; Yu AYX; Vyas MV; Kapral MK
    Neurology; 2021 Nov; 97(18):856-863. PubMed ID: 34504033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Cautionary Note on Using Propensity Score Calibration to Control for Unmeasured Confounding Bias When the Surrogacy Assumption Is Absent.
    Wan F
    Am J Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 193(2):360-369. PubMed ID: 37759344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of the E-value for sensitivity analysis.
    Chung WT; Chung KC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Nov; 163():92-94. PubMed ID: 37783401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Propensity scores for confounder adjustment when assessing the effects of medical interventions using nonexperimental study designs.
    Stürmer T; Wyss R; Glynn RJ; Brookhart MA
    J Intern Med; 2014 Jun; 275(6):570-80. PubMed ID: 24520806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index.
    Mitchell JD; Gage BF; Fergestrom N; Novak E; Villines TC
    J Vis Exp; 2020 Jan; (155):. PubMed ID: 31984959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Control of confounding in the analysis phase - an overview for clinicians.
    Kahlert J; Gribsholt SB; Gammelager H; Dekkers OM; Luta G
    Clin Epidemiol; 2017; 9():195-204. PubMed ID: 28408854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Right Tool for the Job: Choosing Between Covariate-balancing and Generalized Boosted Model Propensity Scores.
    Setodji CM; McCaffrey DF; Burgette LF; Almirall D; Griffin BA
    Epidemiology; 2017 Nov; 28(6):802-811. PubMed ID: 28817469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Confounding adjustment in observational studies on cardiothoracic interventions: a systematic review of methodological practice.
    Velders BJJ; Boltje JWT; Vriesendorp MD; Klautz RJM; Le Cessie S; Groenwold RHH
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Oct; 64(4):. PubMed ID: 37505476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Tutorial and Case Study in Propensity Score Analysis: An Application to Estimating the Effect of In-Hospital Smoking Cessation Counseling on Mortality.
    Austin PC
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2011; 46(1):119-151. PubMed ID: 22287812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Propensity score methods and unobserved covariate imbalance: comments on "squeezing the balloon".
    Ali MS; Groenwold RH; Klungel OH
    Health Serv Res; 2014 Jun; 49(3):1074-82. PubMed ID: 24461192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Propensity score matching for comparative studies: a tutorial with R and Rex.
    Lee B; Kim NE; Won S; Gim J
    J Minim Invasive Surg; 2024 Jun; 27(2):55-71. PubMed ID: 38886996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methodological progress note: A clinician's guide to propensity scores.
    Ambroggio L; Cotter JM; Hall M
    J Hosp Med; 2022 Apr; 17(4):283-286. PubMed ID: 35535919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correction to "Propensity score weighting for covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials".
    Zeng S; Li F; Wang R; Li F
    Stat Med; 2024 Aug; 43(19):3759. PubMed ID: 38881284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Addressing Unmeasured Confounders in Observational Surgical Studies: E-values.
    Chang DC; Cauley CE
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jun; 27(6):1296-1297. PubMed ID: 37221387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Studies with many covariates and few outcomes: selecting covariates and implementing propensity-score-based confounding adjustments.
    Patorno E; Glynn RJ; Hernández-Díaz S; Liu J; Schneeweiss S
    Epidemiology; 2014 Mar; 25(2):268-78. PubMed ID: 24487209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical primer: propensity score matching and its alternatives.
    Benedetto U; Head SJ; Angelini GD; Blackstone EH
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Jun; 53(6):1112-1117. PubMed ID: 29684154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rates of re-excision and conversion to mastectomy after breast-conserving surgery with or without oncoplastic surgery: a nationwide population-based study.
    Heeg E; Jensen MB; Hölmich LR; Bodilsen A; Tollenaar RAEM; Laenkholm AV; Offersen BV; Ejlertsen B; Mureau MAM; Christiansen PM
    Br J Surg; 2020 Dec; 107(13):1762-1772. PubMed ID: 32761931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.