These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23859603)

  • 1. Heterophoria adaptation during the viewing of 3D stereoscopic stimuli.
    Karpicka E; Howarth PA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Sep; 33(5):604-10. PubMed ID: 23859603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stereoscopic viewing and reported perceived immersion and symptoms.
    Yang SN; Schlieski T; Selmins B; Cooper SC; Doherty RA; Corriveau PJ; Sheedy JE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 89(7):1068-80. PubMed ID: 22733100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic accommodative response to different visual stimuli (2D vs 3D) while watching television and while playing Nintendo 3DS console.
    Oliveira S; Jorge J; González-Méijome JM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Sep; 32(5):383-9. PubMed ID: 22882150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual fatigue and discomfort after stereoscopic display viewing.
    Zhang L; Zhang YQ; Zhang JS; Xu L; Jonas JB
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar; 91(2):e149-53. PubMed ID: 23164154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stereoscopic 3D entertainment and its effect on viewing comfort: comparison of children and adults.
    Pölönen M; Järvenpää T; Bilcu B
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Jan; 44(1):151-60. PubMed ID: 22818394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual fatigue while watching 3D stimuli from different positions.
    Aznar-Casanova JA; Romeo A; Gómez AT; Enrile PM
    J Optom; 2017; 10(3):149-160. PubMed ID: 27544414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ophthalmological factors influencing visual asthenopia as a result of viewing 3D displays.
    Wee SW; Moon NJ; Lee WK; Jeon S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Nov; 96(11):1391-4. PubMed ID: 22952400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of heterophoria type and myopia on accommodative and vergence responses during sustained near activity in children.
    Sreenivasan V; Irving EL; Bobier WR
    Vision Res; 2012 Mar; 57():9-17. PubMed ID: 22322001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Change in the Fusion Limit by Insertion of a Middle Image Equally Dividing the Parallactic Angle of 3D Stereoscopic Images].
    Uneme C; Kojima T; Sugiura A; Morita I; Miyao M
    Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2017; 72(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 28154366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stereoacuity as an indicator of prism adaptation.
    Momeni-Moghaddam H; Eperjesi F; Kundart J; Mostafavi-Nam K
    Curr Eye Res; 2014 Aug; 39(8):775-9. PubMed ID: 24559406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lateral short-term prism adaptation in clinical evaluation.
    Pickwell LD; Kurtz BH
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1986; 6(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 3714278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantification of heterophoria and phoria adaptation using an automated objective system compared to clinical methods.
    Han SJ; Guo Y; Granger-Donetti B; Vicci VR; Alvarez TL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Jan; 30(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 19682268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3D visual discomfort predictor: analysis of horizontal disparity and neural activity statistics.
    Park J; Oh H; Lee S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Mar; 24(3):1101-14. PubMed ID: 25532185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional display-induced transient myopia and the difference in myopic shift between crossed and uncrossed disparities.
    Suh YW; Oh J; Kim HM; Cho YA; Song JS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Jul; 53(8):5029-32. PubMed ID: 22761261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Depth-of-Focus Affects 3D Perception in Stereoscopic Displays.
    Vienne C; Blondé L; Mamassian P
    Perception; 2015; 44(6):613-27. PubMed ID: 26489206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transfer Function Model of Physiological Mechanisms Underlying Temporal Visual Discomfort Experienced When Viewing Stereoscopic 3D Images.
    Kim T; Lee S; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Nov; 24(11):4335-47. PubMed ID: 26241973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deficient vergence prism adaptation in subjects with decompensated heterophoria.
    Przekoracka-Krawczyk A; Michalak KP; Pyżalska P
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0211039. PubMed ID: 30657792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Visual fatigue evaluation of field sequential stereoscopic 3D display using near point distance].
    Yamazaki T; Kamijo K
    Ann Physiol Anthropol; 1989 Jul; 8(3):127-32. PubMed ID: 2803369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of accommodation and ocular surface stability relevant to visual asthenopia with 3D displays.
    Wee SW; Moon NJ
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2014 Mar; 14():29. PubMed ID: 24612686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental investigations of pupil accommodation factors.
    Lee EC; Lee JW; Park KR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 52(9):6478-85. PubMed ID: 21357391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.