147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23859988)
1. Removal of chromium and lead by a sulfate-reducing consortium using peat moss as carbon source.
Márquez-Reyes JM; López-Chuken UJ; Valdez-González A; Luna-Olvera HA
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Sep; 144():128-34. PubMed ID: 23859988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Removal of sulphate, COD and Cr(VI) in simulated and real wastewater by sulphate reducing bacteria enrichment in small bioreactor and FTIR study.
Singh R; Kumar A; Kirrolia A; Kumar R; Yadav N; Bishnoi NR; Lohchab RK
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):677-82. PubMed ID: 20884204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of feed COD/sulfate ratio as a control criterion for the biological hydrogen sulfide production and lead precipitation.
Velasco A; Ramírez M; Volke-Sepúlveda T; González-Sánchez A; Revah S
J Hazard Mater; 2008 Mar; 151(2-3):407-13. PubMed ID: 17640800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biological pre-treatment of wastewater containing sulfate using anaerobic immobilized cells.
Kuo WC; Shu TY
J Hazard Mater; 2004 Sep; 113(1-3):147-55. PubMed ID: 15363525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enhanced sulfate reduction with acidogenic sulfate-reducing bacteria.
Wang A; Ren N; Wang X; Lee D
J Hazard Mater; 2008 Jun; 154(1-3):1060-5. PubMed ID: 18093734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Silage supports sulfate reduction in the treatment of metals- and sulfate-containing waste waters.
Wakeman KD; Erving L; Riekkola-Vanhanen ML; Puhakka JA
Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(17):4932-9. PubMed ID: 20708212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of sulfide production by an indigenous consortium of sulfate-reducing bacteria for the treatment of lead-contaminated wastewater.
Kieu TQ; Nguyen TY; Dang TY; Nguyen TB; Vuong TN; Horn H
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2015 Oct; 38(10):2003-11. PubMed ID: 26251206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lead removal and toxicity reduction from industrial wastewater through biological sulfate reduction process.
Teekayuttasakul P; Annachhatre AP
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2008 Oct; 43(12):1424-30. PubMed ID: 18780220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anaerobic degradation of landfill leachate using an upflow anaerobic fixed-bed reactor with microbial sulfate reduction.
Thabet OB; Bouallagui H; Cayol JL; Ollivier B; Fardeau ML; Hamdi M
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Aug; 167(1-3):1133-40. PubMed ID: 19272702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Removal of H(2)S by Thiobacillus denitrificans immobilized on different matrices.
Ma YL; Yang BL; Zhao JL
Bioresour Technol; 2006 Nov; 97(16):2041-6. PubMed ID: 16289624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of cellulose waste versus organic waste as substrate in a sulfate reducing bioreactor.
Choudhary RP; Sheoran AS
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Mar; 102(6):4319-24. PubMed ID: 20926292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of sulfide removal on sulfate reduction at pH 5 in a hydrogen fed gas-lift bioreactor.
Bijmans MF; Dopson M; Ennin F; Lens PN; Buisman CJ
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2008 Nov; 18(11):1809-18. PubMed ID: 19047826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neural network prediction of thermophilic (65 degrees C) sulfidogenic fluidized-bed reactor performance for the treatment of metal-containing wastewater.
Sahinkaya E; Ozkaya B; Kaksonen AH; Puhakka JA
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Jul; 97(4):780-7. PubMed ID: 17154306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Containment of biogenic sulfide production in continuous up-flow packed-bed bioreactors with nitrate or nitrite.
Hubert C; Nemati M; Jenneman G; Voordouw G
Biotechnol Prog; 2003; 19(2):338-45. PubMed ID: 12675569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of feeding strategy and COD/sulfate ratio on the removal of sulfate in an AnSBBR with recirculation of the liquid phase.
Archilha NC; Canto CS; Ratusznei SM; Rodrigues JA; Zaiat M; Foresti E
J Environ Manage; 2010 Aug; 91(8):1756-65. PubMed ID: 20413213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Removal of chromium from synthetic plating waste by zero-valent iron and sulfate-reducing bacteria.
Guha S; Bhargava P
Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(4):411-6. PubMed ID: 16121509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sulfidogenic fluidized bed treatment of real acid mine drainage water.
Sahinkaya E; Gunes FM; Ucar D; Kaksonen AH
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):683-9. PubMed ID: 20832297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of COD/SO(4)(2-) ratio and sulfide on thermophilic (55 degrees C) sulfate reduction during the acidification of sucrose at pH 6.
Lopes SI; Wang X; Capela MI; Lens PN
Water Res; 2007 Jun; 41(11):2379-92. PubMed ID: 17434203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Removal of chromium and pentachlorophenol from tannery effluents.
Srivastava S; Ahmad AH; Thakur IS
Bioresour Technol; 2007 Mar; 98(5):1128-32. PubMed ID: 16762546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biofiltration using peat and a nutritional synthetic packing material: influence of the packing configuration on H2S removal.
Dumont E; Cabral Fda S; Le Cloirec P; Andrès Y
Environ Technol; 2013; 34(9-12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 24191444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
