119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23860190)
1. Diagnostic usefulness of MUC1 and MUC4 for distinguishing between metastatic adenocarcinoma cells and reactive mesothelial cells in effusion cell blocks.
Cho JS; Kim GE; Lee JS; Lee JH; Nam JH; Choi C
Acta Cytol; 2013; 57(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 23860190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic Usefulness of Claudin-3 and Claudin-4 for Immunocytochemical Differentiation between Metastatic Adenocarcinoma Cells and Reactive Mesothelial Cells in Effusion Cell Blocks.
Kim NI; Kim GE; Lee JS
Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(3):232-9. PubMed ID: 27387183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MUC4 is upregulated in ovarian carcinoma effusions and differentiates carcinoma cells from mesothelial cells.
Davidson B; Baekelandt M; Shih IeM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Dec; 35(12):756-60. PubMed ID: 18008338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Immunocytochemical panel for distinguishing between adenocarcinomas and reactive mesothelial cells in effusion cell blocks.
Kim JH; Kim GE; Choi YD; Lee JS; Lee JH; Nam JH; Choi C
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Apr; 37(4):258-61. PubMed ID: 19217030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Immunocytochemical panel for distinguishing between carcinoma and reactive mesothelial cells in body cavity fluids.
Politi E; Kandaraki C; Apostolopoulou C; Kyritsi T; Koutselini H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 15690338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Malignant mesothelioma: immunohistochemistry and DNA ploidy analysis as methods to differentiate mesothelioma from benign reactive mesothelial cell proliferation and adenocarcinoma in pleural and peritoneal effusions.
Friedman MT; Gentile P; Tarectecan A; Fuchs A
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Oct; 120(10):959-66. PubMed ID: 12046609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Insulin-like growth factor-II mRNA-binding protein 3 expression in effusion cytology: a marker for metastatic adenocarcinoma cells and a potential prognostic indicator in gastric adenocarcinoma.
Kim HJ; Kim GE; Lee JS; Lee JH; Nam JH; Choi C
Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 24457229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. GATA3: a promising marker for metastatic breast carcinoma in serous effusion specimens.
Shield PW; Papadimos DJ; Walsh MD
Cancer Cytopathol; 2014 Apr; 122(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 24421220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The diagnostic utility of D2-40, calretinin, CK5/6, desmin and MOC-31 in the differentiation of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma in pleural effusion cytology.
Hyun TS; Barnes M; Tabatabai ZL
Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 23075894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of immunohistochemistry to distinguish reactive mesothelial cells from malignant mesothelioma in cytologic effusions.
Hasteh F; Lin GY; Weidner N; Michael CW
Cancer Cytopathol; 2010 Apr; 118(2):90-6. PubMed ID: 20209622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. D2-40 is not a specific marker for cells of mesothelial origin in serous effusions.
Bassarova AV; Nesland JM; Davidson B
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Jul; 30(7):878-82. PubMed ID: 16819331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differentiation of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma in serous effusions: the role of hyaluronic acid and CD44 localization.
Afify AM; Stern R; Michael CW
Diagn Cytopathol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 15690337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of BCA-225 in the cytologic diagnosis of malignant effusions: an immunocytochemical study of 197 cases.
Loy TS; Diaz-Arias AA; Bickel JT
Mod Pathol; 1990 May; 3(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 2194212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differential diagnosis of reactive mesothelial cells and malignant mesothelioma cells using the cell proliferation markers minichromosome maintenance protein 7, geminin, topoisomerase II alpha and Ki-67.
Kimura F; Okayasu I; Kakinuma H; Satoh Y; Kuwao S; Saegusa M; Watanabe J
Acta Cytol; 2013; 57(4):384-90. PubMed ID: 23860238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiating reactive mesothelial cells from metastatic adenocarcinoma in serous effusions: the utility of immunocytochemical panel in the differential diagnosis.
Saleh HA; El-Fakharany M; Makki H; Kadhim A; Masood S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 May; 37(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 19191294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cytological differential diagnosis among adenocarcinoma, epithelial mesothelioma, and reactive mesothelial cells in serous effusions by immunocytochemistry.
Su XY; Li GD; Liu WP; Xie B; Jiang YH
Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Dec; 39(12):900-8. PubMed ID: 20836004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A comparative evaluation of immunohistochemical markers for the differential diagnosis between malignant mesothelioma, non-small cell carcinoma involving the pleura, and benign reactive mesothelial cell proliferation].
Szczepulska-Wójcik E; Langfort R; Roszkowski-Sliz K
Pneumonol Alergol Pol; 2007; 75(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 17541913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The value of calretinin and cytokeratin 5/6 as markers for mesothelioma in cell block preparations of serous effusions.
Shield PW; Koivurinne K
Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):218-23. PubMed ID: 17916095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of the monoclonal antibody MOC-31 as an immunomarker for detecting metastatic adenocarcinoma in effusion cytology.
Kundu UR; Krishnamurthy S
Cancer Cytopathol; 2011 Aug; 119(4):272-8. PubMed ID: 21732548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three cytologic preparation methods and immunocytochemistries to distinguish adenocarcinoma cells from reactive mesothelial cells in serous effusion.
Ueda J; Iwata T; Ono M; Takahashi M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Jan; 34(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 16355377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
