These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23860380)

  • 1. Habitat monitoring in the wider countryside: a case study on the pursuit of innovation in red deer management.
    Maffey G; Reed M; Irvine RJ; van der Wal R
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():779-86. PubMed ID: 23860380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can digital reinvention of ecological monitoring remove barriers to its adoption by practitioners? A case study of deer management in Scotland.
    Maffey G; Irvine RJ; Reed M; van der Wal R
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 184(Pt 2):186-195. PubMed ID: 27707658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Collaboration in natural resource governance: reconciling stakeholder expectations in deer management in Scotland.
    Davies AL; White RM
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Dec; 112():160-9. PubMed ID: 22898708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tradeable hunting obligations--a new approach to regulating red deer numbers in the Scottish Highlands?
    MacMillan D
    J Environ Manage; 2004 Jul; 71(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 15158288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Red deer stocks in the Highlands of Scotland.
    Clutton-Brock TH; Coulson T; Milner JM
    Nature; 2004 May; 429(6989):261-2. PubMed ID: 15152241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of biological monitoring and results outreach on private landowner conservation management.
    Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Heggenstaller E; Larkin JL
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194740. PubMed ID: 29617388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding barriers to implementation of an adaptive land management program.
    Jacobson SK; Morris JK; Sanders JS; Wiley EN; Brooks M; Bennetts RE; Percival HF; Marynowski S
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Oct; 20(5):1516-27. PubMed ID: 17002769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human recreation affects spatio-temporal habitat use patterns in red deer (Cervus elaphus).
    Coppes J; Burghardt F; Hagen R; Suchant R; Braunisch V
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0175134. PubMed ID: 28467429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marine monitoring: Its shortcomings and mismatch with the EU Water Framework Directive's objectives.
    de Jonge VN; Elliott M; Brauer VS
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2006; 53(1-4):5-19. PubMed ID: 16426645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of sika deer grazing on the vegetation and infauna of Arne saltmarsh.
    Hannaford J; Pinn EH; Diaz A
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2006; 53(1-4):56-62. PubMed ID: 16246379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The links between protected areas, faiths, and sacred natural sites.
    Dudley N; Higgins-Zogib L; Mansourian S
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Jun; 23(3):568-77. PubMed ID: 22748093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Designing cost-effective payments for conservation measures to generate spatiotemporal habitat heterogeneity.
    Drechsler M; Johst K; Ohl C; Wätzold F
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1475-86. PubMed ID: 18173471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A riparian wildlife habitat evaluation scheme developed using GIS.
    Iverson LR; Szafoni DL; Baum SE; Cook EA
    Environ Manage; 2001 Nov; 28(5):639-54. PubMed ID: 11568844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conceptual design of monitoring and evaluation plans for fish and wildlife in the Columbia River ecosystem.
    Bisbal GA
    Environ Manage; 2001 Oct; 28(4):433-53. PubMed ID: 11494064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring stock and change in the GB countryside for policy--key findings and developments from the Countryside Survey 2007 field survey.
    Norton LR; Maskell LC; Smart SS; Dunbar MJ; Emmett BA; Carey PD; Williams P; Crowe A; Chandler K; Scott WA; Wood CM
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Dec; 113():117-27. PubMed ID: 23010623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating areas of high conservation value in Western Oregon with a decision-support model.
    Staus NL; Strittholt JR; Dellasala DA
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Jun; 24(3):711-20. PubMed ID: 20184658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A legal and ecological perspective of 'site integrity' to inform policy development and management of Special Areas of Conservation in Europe.
    Rees SE; Sheehan EV; Jackson EL; Gall SC; Cousens SL; Solandt JL; Boyer M; Attrill MJ
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2013 Jul; 72(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 23628546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploring red deer culling strategies using a population-specific calibrated management model.
    Trenkel VM
    J Environ Manage; 2001 May; 62(1):37-53. PubMed ID: 11400464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cumulative impacts on seabed habitats: an indicator for assessments of good environmental status.
    Korpinen S; Meidinger M; Laamanen M
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2013 Sep; 74(1):311-9. PubMed ID: 23849951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Payments for ecosystem services as a framework for community-based conservation in northern Tanzania.
    Nelson F; Foley C; Foley LS; Leposo A; Loure E; Peterson D; Peterson M; Peterson T; Sachedina H; Williams A
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Feb; 24(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 20121844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.