203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23860816)
1. The use of synthetic mesh in reconstructive, revision, and cosmetic breast surgery.
Becker H; Lind JG
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Oct; 37(5):914-21. PubMed ID: 23860816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Use of Synthetic Mesh in Reconstructive, Revision, and Cosmetic Breast Surgery.
Becker H; Lind Ii JG
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2020 Aug; 44(4):1120-1127. PubMed ID: 32844265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Use of TIGR Matrix in Breast Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery: Is a Resorbable Synthetic Mesh a Viable Alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices?
Pompei S; Evangelidou D; Arelli F; Ferrante G
Clin Plast Surg; 2018 Jan; 45(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 29080661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. TIGR matrix for implant-based breast reconstruction - a long-term resorbable mesh.
Cuffolo G; Holford NC; Contractor K; Tenovici A
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2018 Sep; 15(9):689-691. PubMed ID: 30139282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of porcine acellular dermal matrix in revisionary cosmetic breast augmentation.
Pozner JN; White JB; Newman MI
Aesthet Surg J; 2013 Jul; 33(5):681-90. PubMed ID: 23813397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applications of acellular dermal matrix in revision breast reconstruction surgery.
Spear SL; Sher SR; Al-Attar A; Pittman T
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Jan; 133(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 24105085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Porcine acellular dermal matrix (strattice) in primary and revision cosmetic breast surgery.
Spear SL; Sinkin JC; Al-Attar A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 May; 131(5):1140-1148. PubMed ID: 23629094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Splitting the Difference: Using Synthetic and Biologic Mesh to Decrease Cost in Prepectoral Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction.
Karp NS; Salibian AA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):580-584. PubMed ID: 33620924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. TIGR
Hallberg H; Lewin R; Elander A; Hansson E
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2018 Aug; 52(4):253-258. PubMed ID: 29874964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Acellular dermal matrix and synthetic mesh in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: Current concepts].
Billon R; Hersant B; Bosc R; Meningaud JP
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019 Mar; 47(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30738819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vicryl mesh in expander/implant breast reconstruction: long-term follow-up in 38 patients.
Haynes DF; Kreithen JC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Nov; 134(5):892-899. PubMed ID: 25347625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Study of Meshed and Nonmeshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Maisel Lotan A; Ben Yehuda D; Allweis TM; Scheflan M
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Nov; 144(5):1045-1053. PubMed ID: 31441807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of acellular dermal matrices in revisionary aesthetic breast surgery: a 6-year experience.
Maxwell GP; Gabriel A
Aesthet Surg J; 2013 Mar; 33(3):389-99. PubMed ID: 23439064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acellular dermal matrix for the treatment and prevention of implant-associated breast deformities.
Spear SL; Seruya M; Clemens MW; Teitelbaum S; Nahabedian MY
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Mar; 127(3):1047-1058. PubMed ID: 21088648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix.
Vardanian AJ; Clayton JL; Roostaeian J; Shirvanian V; Da Lio A; Lipa JE; Crisera C; Festekjian JH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Nov; 128(5):403e-410e. PubMed ID: 22030500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of Prepectoral Implant Placement and Complete Coverage with TiLoop Bra Mesh for Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Study on Long-Term and Patient-Reported BREAST-Q Outcomes.
Casella D; Di Taranto G; Marcasciano M; Sordi S; Kothari A; Kovacs T; Lo Torto F; Cigna E; Calabrese C; Ribuffo D
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jan; 143(1):1e-9e. PubMed ID: 30303929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-cross-linked porcine acellular dermal matrix in revision breast surgery: long-term outcomes and safety with neopectoral pockets.
Maxwell GP; Gabriel A
Aesthet Surg J; 2014 May; 34(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 24692599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Revisions in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: How Does Direct-to-Implant Measure Up?
Clarke-Pearson EM; Lin AM; Hertl C; Austen WG; Colwell AS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Jun; 137(6):1690-1699. PubMed ID: 27219225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of acellular dermal matrices in revisional breast reconstruction.
Slavin SA; Lin SJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Nov; 130(5 Suppl 2):70S-85S. PubMed ID: 23096989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Beyond biologics: absorbable mesh as a low-cost, low-complication sling for implant-based breast reconstruction.
Tessler O; Reish RG; Maman DY; Smith BL; Austen WG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Feb; 133(2):90e-99e. PubMed ID: 24469217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
