168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23861160)
1. Cervical disc deformation during flexion-extension in asymptomatic controls and single-level arthrodesis patients.
Anderst W; Donaldson W; Lee J; Kang J
J Orthop Res; 2013 Dec; 31(12):1881-9. PubMed ID: 23861160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Six-degrees-of-freedom cervical spine range of motion during dynamic flexion-extension after single-level anterior arthrodesis: comparison with asymptomatic control subjects.
Anderst WJ; Lee JY; Donaldson WF; Kang JD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):497-506. PubMed ID: 23515984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Motion path of the instant center of rotation in the cervical spine during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension: implications for artificial disc design and evaluation of motion quality after arthrodesis.
Anderst W; Baillargeon E; Donaldson W; Lee J; Kang J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(10):E594-601. PubMed ID: 23429677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo cervical facet joint capsule deformation during flexion-extension.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Apr; 39(8):E514-20. PubMed ID: 24480943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ranges of Cervical Intervertebral Disc Deformation During an In Vivo Dynamic Flexion-Extension of the Neck.
Yu Y; Mao H; Li JS; Tsai TY; Cheng L; Wood KB; Li G; Cha TD
J Biomech Eng; 2017 Jun; 139(6):0645011-7. PubMed ID: 28334358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Continuous cervical spine kinematics during in vivo dynamic flexion-extension.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine J; 2014 Jul; 14(7):1221-7. PubMed ID: 24210579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical motion segment percent contributions to flexion-extension during continuous functional movement in control subjects and arthrodesis patients.
Anderst WJ; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Kang JD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(9):E533-9. PubMed ID: 23370681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic functional nucleus is a potential biomarker for structural degeneration in cervical spine discs.
LeVasseur CM; Wawrose R; Pitcairn S; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Anderst WJ
J Orthop Res; 2019 Apr; 37(4):965-971. PubMed ID: 30747456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In Vivo Changes in Dynamic Adjacent Segment Motion 1 Year After One and Two-Level Cervical Arthrodesis.
LeVasseur CM; Pitcairn SW; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Shaw JD; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Anderst WJ
Ann Biomed Eng; 2022 Jul; 50(7):871-881. PubMed ID: 35397715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical Spine Disc Deformation During In Vivo Three-Dimensional Head Movements.
Anderst W; Donaldson W; Lee J; Kang J
Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 May; 44(5):1598-612. PubMed ID: 26271522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Best NM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic foraminal dimensions during neck extension and rotation in fusion and artificial disc replacement: an observational study.
Yeni YN; Baumer T; Oravec D; Basheer A; McDonald CP; Bey MJ; Bartol SW; Chang V
Spine J; 2018 Apr; 18(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 28882520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical spine kinematics after anterior cervical discectomy with or without implantation of a mobile cervical disc prosthesis; an RCT.
Boselie TF; van Mameren H; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Feb; 16():34. PubMed ID: 25887569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative Study Between M6-C and Mobi-C Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement: Biomechanical Outcomes and Comparison with Normative Data.
Pham M; Phan K; Teng I; Mobbs RJ
Orthop Surg; 2018 May; 10(2):84-88. PubMed ID: 29878713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adjacent-segment range of motion following anterior cervical fusion: commentary on an article by William J. Anderst, MS et al.: "Six-degrees-of-freedom cervical spine range of motion during dynamic flexion-extension after single-level anterior arthrodesis. Comparison with asymptomatic control subjects".
Riew KD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):e381-2. PubMed ID: 23515997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are the standard parameters of cervical spine alignment and range of motion related to age, sex, and cervical disc degeneration?
Liu B; Wu B; Van Hoof T; Okito JP; Liu Z; Zeng Z
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):274-9. PubMed ID: 26091436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Kinematic study of the relation between the instantaneous center of rotation and degenerative changes in the cervical intervertebral disc.
Liu B; Liu Z; VanHoof T; Kalala J; Zeng Z; Lin X
Eur Spine J; 2014 Nov; 23(11):2307-13. PubMed ID: 24972979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical analysis of disc pressure and facet contact force after simulated two-level cervical surgeries (fusion and arthroplasty) and hybrid surgery.
Park J; Shin JJ; Lim J
World Neurosurg; 2014 Dec; 82(6):1388-93. PubMed ID: 24937596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
