These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Recalibration of phonetic categories by lipread speech versus lexical information. van Linden S; Vroomen J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1483-94. PubMed ID: 18085958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interleaved lexical and audiovisual information can retune phoneme boundaries. Ullas S; Formisano E; Eisner F; Cutler A Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):2018-2026. PubMed ID: 31970708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing lexically guided perceptual learning in younger and older listeners. Scharenborg O; Janse E Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Apr; 75(3):525-36. PubMed ID: 23354594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Attentional resources contribute to the perceptual learning of talker idiosyncrasies in audiovisual speech. Jesse A; Kaplan E Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1006-1019. PubMed ID: 30684204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. More than a boundary shift: Perceptual adaptation to foreign-accented speech reshapes the internal structure of phonetic categories. Xie X; Theodore RM; Myers EB J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jan; 43(1):206-217. PubMed ID: 27819457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A phonetic explanation of pronunciation variant effects. Sumner M J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL26-32. PubMed ID: 23862902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of voice onset time differences on lexical access in Dutch. van Alphen PM; McQueen JM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):178-96. PubMed ID: 16478335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phonetic recalibration of speech by text. Keetels M; Schakel L; Bonte M; Vroomen J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):938-45. PubMed ID: 26704562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Phonological abstraction without phonemes in speech perception. Mitterer H; Scharenborg O; McQueen JM Cognition; 2013 Nov; 129(2):356-61. PubMed ID: 23973464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of face masks on recalibration of phonetic categories. Drouin JR; Rojas JA Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Nov; 85(8):2700-2717. PubMed ID: 37188863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Boosting lexical support does not enhance lexically guided perceptual learning. Luthra S; Magnuson JS; Myers EB J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Apr; 47(4):685-704. PubMed ID: 33983786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contextual influences on the internal structure of phonetic categories: a distinction between lexical status and speaking rate. Allen JS; Miller JL Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):798-810. PubMed ID: 11521848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Asymmetric processing of lexical tonal contrast in Swedish. Felder V; Jönsson-Steiner E; Eulitz C; Lahiri A Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1890-9. PubMed ID: 19933571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neural Correlates of Phonetic Adaptation as Induced by Lexical and Audiovisual Context. Ullas S; Hausfeld L; Cutler A; Eisner F; Formisano E J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Nov; 32(11):2145-2158. PubMed ID: 32662723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]