126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23862899)
1. Maintaining intelligibility at high speech intensities: evidence of lateral inhibition in the lower auditory pathway.
Bashford JA; Warren RM; Lenz PW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL119-25. PubMed ID: 23862899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How broadband speech may avoid neural firing rate saturation at high intensities and maintain intelligibility.
Bashford JA; Warren RM; Lenz PW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Apr; 137(4):EL340-6. PubMed ID: 25920887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhancing the intelligibility of high intensity speech: Evidence of inhibition in the lower auditory pathway.
Bashford JA; Warren RM; Lenz PW
Proc Meet Acoust; 2011 Oct; 12():. PubMed ID: 22639703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Free-field binaural unmasking in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
Dent ML; Larsen ON; Dooling RJ
Behav Neurosci; 1997 Jun; 111(3):590-598. PubMed ID: 9189273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus to binaural masking level difference stimuli measured by rate-versus-level functions.
Jiang D; McAlpine D; Palmer AR
J Neurophysiol; 1997 Jun; 77(6):3085-106. PubMed ID: 9212259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Azimuthal receptive fields are shaped by GABAergic inhibition in the inferior colliculus of the mustache bat.
Park TJ; Pollak GD
J Neurophysiol; 1994 Sep; 72(3):1080-102. PubMed ID: 7807197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two separate inhibitory mechanisms shape the responses of dorsal cochlear nucleus type IV units to narrowband and wideband stimuli.
Nelken I; Young ED
J Neurophysiol; 1994 Jun; 71(6):2446-62. PubMed ID: 7931527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Amplitude-mapping effects on speech intelligibility with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants.
van Hoesel R; Böhm M; Battmer RD; Beckschebe J; Lenarz T
Ear Hear; 2005 Aug; 26(4):381-8. PubMed ID: 16079633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
Wu YH; Stangl E; Pang C; Zhang X
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pitch and spectral resolution: A systematic comparison of bottom-up cues for top-down repair of degraded speech.
Clarke J; Başkent D; Gaudrain E
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):395-405. PubMed ID: 26827034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Encoding of amplitude modulation in the cochlear nucleus of the cat.
Rhode WS; Greenberg S
J Neurophysiol; 1994 May; 71(5):1797-825. PubMed ID: 8064349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lateral suppression and inhibition in the cochlear nucleus of the cat.
Rhode WS; Greenberg S
J Neurophysiol; 1994 Feb; 71(2):493-514. PubMed ID: 8176421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lipreading and covert speech production similarly modulate human auditory-cortex responses to pure tones.
Kauramäki J; Jääskeläinen IP; Hari R; Möttönen R; Rauschecker JP; Sams M
J Neurosci; 2010 Jan; 30(4):1314-21. PubMed ID: 20107058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the importance of time-frequency contributions to speech intelligibility in noise.
Yu C; Wójcicki KK; Loizou PC; Hansen JH; Johnson MT
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 May; 135(5):3007-16. PubMed ID: 24815280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The roles of GABAergic and glycinergic inhibition on binaural processing in the dorsal nucleus of the lateral lemniscus of the mustache bat.
Yang L; Pollak GD
J Neurophysiol; 1994 Jun; 71(6):1999-2013. PubMed ID: 7931498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence of the enhancement effect in electrical stimulation via electrode matching (L).
Goupell MJ; Mostardi MJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1007-10. PubMed ID: 22352475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of degradation of intensity, time, or frequency content on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
van Schijndel NH; Houtgast T; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):529-42. PubMed ID: 11508977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Temporal structure model of binaural masking level difference.
Albeck Y; Nebenzahl I; Lewis A
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1389-93. PubMed ID: 1401525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal.
Brungart DS; Simpson BD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):664-76. PubMed ID: 12186046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory mismatch negativity: detecting spectral contrasts in a modulated noise.
Stoody TM; Saoji AA; Atcherson SR
Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Aug; 113(1):268-76. PubMed ID: 21987925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
