These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23863190)

  • 1. Factors influencing decision making on therapeutic interventions.
    Lee SM; Kim G; Ahn J; Suh HS; Heo DS
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2013 Jul; 29(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 23863190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decisions to adopt new technologies at the hospital level: insights from Israeli medical centers.
    Greenberg D; Peterburg Y; Vekstein D; Pliskin JS
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 15921062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How should cost-effectiveness analysis be used in health technology coverage decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approach.
    Williams I; Bryan S; McIver S
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Apr; 12(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17407655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Review of a decision by the Medical Services Advisory Committee based on health technology assessment of an emerging technology: the case for remotely assisted radical prostatectomy.
    O'Malley SP; Jordan E
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(2):286-91. PubMed ID: 17493316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multi-criteria development and incorporation into decision tools for health technology adoption.
    Poulin P; Austen L; Scott CM; Waddell CD; Dixon E; Poulin M; Lafrenière R
    J Health Organ Manag; 2013; 27(2):246-65. PubMed ID: 23802401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health technology assessment in India: the potential for improved healthcare decision-making.
    Kumar M; Ebrahim S; Taylor FC; Chokshi M; Gabbay J
    Natl Med J India; 2014; 27(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 25668089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resource allocation and health technology assessment in Australia: views from the local level.
    Gallego G; van Gool K; Kelleher D
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Apr; 25(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 19331706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence-based decision-making within Australia's pharmaceutical benefits scheme.
    Lopert R
    Issue Brief (Commonw Fund); 2009 Jul; 60():1-13. PubMed ID: 19639714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using evidence to inform coverage decisions: the Washington State experience.
    Blackmore CC
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Sep; 19(9):1055-9. PubMed ID: 22877985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force.
    Sullivan SD; Mauskopf JA; Augustovski F; Jaime Caro J; Lee KM; Minchin M; Orlewska E; Penna P; Rodriguez Barrios JM; Shau WY
    Value Health; 2014; 17(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 24438712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Linking evidence from health technology assessments to policy and decision making: the Alberta model.
    Borowski HZ; Brehaut J; Hailey D
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 17493300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Policy formulation and technology assessment.
    Banta HD; Behney CJ
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1981; 59(3):445-79. PubMed ID: 6792555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Challenges to decision-making processes in the national HTA agency in Brazil: operational procedures, evidence use and recommendations.
    Yuba TY; Novaes HMD; de Soárez PC
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2018 May; 16(1):40. PubMed ID: 29751764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technology decision making. A constructive approach to planning and acquisition will require a paradigm shift.
    Berkowitz DA; Swan MM
    Health Prog; 1993; 74(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 10123568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness analysis and formulary decision making in England: findings from research.
    Williams IP; Bryan S
    Soc Sci Med; 2007 Nov; 65(10):2116-29. PubMed ID: 17698271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of economic evaluation in local health care decision-making in England: a qualitative investigation.
    Eddama O; Coast J
    Health Policy; 2009 Mar; 89(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 18657336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using health technology assessment to support evidence-based decision-making in Canada: an academic perspective.
    Xie F; Bowen JM; Sutherland SC; Burke N; Blackhouse G; Tarride JE; O'Reilly D; Goeree R
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2011 Oct; 11(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 21958096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.