4381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23863760)
1. Efficient design for Mendelian randomization studies: subsample and 2-sample instrumental variable estimators.
Pierce BL; Burgess S
Am J Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 178(7):1177-84. PubMed ID: 23863760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization.
Burgess S; Small DS; Thompson SG
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2333-2355. PubMed ID: 26282889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome.
Burgess S
Int J Epidemiol; 2014 Jun; 43(3):922-9. PubMed ID: 24608958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Power and sample size calculations for Mendelian randomization studies using one genetic instrument.
Freeman G; Cowling BJ; Schooling CM
Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 42(4):1157-63. PubMed ID: 23934314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Approximation of bias and mean-squared error in two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses.
Deng L; Zhang H; Song L; Yu K
Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):369-379. PubMed ID: 31651042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival Bias in Mendelian Randomization Studies: A Threat to Causal Inference.
Smit RAJ; Trompet S; Dekkers OM; Jukema JW; le Cessie S
Epidemiology; 2019 Nov; 30(6):813-816. PubMed ID: 31373921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of non-differential measurement error on bias, precision and power in Mendelian randomization studies.
Pierce BL; VanderWeele TJ
Int J Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 41(5):1383-93. PubMed ID: 23045203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Power and instrument strength requirements for Mendelian randomization studies using multiple genetic variants.
Pierce BL; Ahsan H; Vanderweele TJ
Int J Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 40(3):740-52. PubMed ID: 20813862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pleiotropy-robust Mendelian randomization.
van Kippersluis H; Rietveld CA
Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 47(4):1279-1288. PubMed ID: 28338774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Weak-instrument robust tests in two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization.
Wang S; Kang H
Biometrics; 2022 Dec; 78(4):1699-1713. PubMed ID: 34213007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mendelian randomization mixed-scale treatment effect robust identification and estimation for causal inference.
Liu Z; Ye T; Sun B; Schooling M; Tchetgen ET
Biometrics; 2023 Sep; 79(3):2208-2219. PubMed ID: 35950778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cross-fitted instrument: A blueprint for one-sample Mendelian randomization.
Denault WRP; Bohlin J; Page CM; Burgess S; Jugessur A
PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Aug; 18(8):e1010268. PubMed ID: 36037248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combining information on multiple instrumental variables in Mendelian randomization: comparison of allele score and summarized data methods.
Burgess S; Dudbridge F; Thompson SG
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(11):1880-906. PubMed ID: 26661904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies.
Burgess S; Thompson SG;
Int J Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 40(3):755-64. PubMed ID: 21414999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of the instrumental inequalities in simulated mendelian randomization analyses with coarsened exposures.
Diemer EW; Shi J; Hernan MA; Swanson SA
Eur J Epidemiol; 2024 May; 39(5):491-499. PubMed ID: 38819552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing concordance of instrumental variable effects in generalized linear models with application to Mendelian randomization.
Dai JY; Chan KC; Hsu L
Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(23):3986-4007. PubMed ID: 24863158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of variance estimators for meta-analysis of instrumental variable estimates.
Schmidt AF; Hingorani AD; Jefferis BJ; White J; Groenwold R; Dudbridge F;
Int J Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 45(6):1975-1986. PubMed ID: 27591262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mendelian randomization studies: a review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting.
Boef AG; Dekkers OM; le Cessie S
Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):496-511. PubMed ID: 25953784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Overlapping-sample Mendelian randomisation with multiple exposures: a Bayesian approach.
Zou L; Guo H; Berzuini C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Dec; 20(1):295. PubMed ID: 33287714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of allele scores as instrumental variables for Mendelian randomization.
Burgess S; Thompson SG
Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 42(4):1134-44. PubMed ID: 24062299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
